+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Application of alternative anthropometric measurements to predict metabolic syndrome

Application of alternative anthropometric measurements to predict metabolic syndrome

Clinics 69(5): 347-353

The association between rarely used anthropometric measurements (e.g., mid-upper arm, forearm, and calf circumference) and metabolic syndrome has not been proven. The aim of this study was to assess whether mid-upper arm, forearm, calf, and waist circumferences, as well as waist/height ratio and waist-to-hip ratio, were associated with metabolic syndrome. We enrolled 387 subjects (340 women, 47 men) who were admitted to the obesity outpatient department of Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital between September 2010 and December 2010. The following measurements were recorded: waist circumference, hip circumference, waist/height ratio, waist-to-hip ratio, mid-upper arm circumference, forearm circumference, calf circumference, and body composition. Fasting blood samples were collected to measure plasma glucose, lipids, uric acid, insulin, and HbA1c. The odds ratios for visceral fat (measured via bioelectric impedance), hip circumference, forearm circumference, and waist circumference/hip circumference were 2.19 (95% CI, 1.30-3.71), 1.89 (95% CI, 1.07-3.35), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.24-4.95), and 2.11(95% CI, 1.26-3.53), respectively. The bioelectric impedance-measured body fat percentage correlated with waist circumference only in subjects without metabolic syndrome; the body fat percentage was negatively correlated with waist circumference/hip circumference in the metabolic syndrome group. All measurements except for forearm circumference were equally well correlated with the bioelectric impedance-measured body fat percentages in both groups. Hip circumference was moderately correlated with bioelectric impedance-measured visceral fat in subjects without metabolic syndrome. Muscle mass (measured via bioelectric impedance) was weakly correlated with waist and forearm circumference in subjects with metabolic syndrome and with calf circumference in subjects without metabolic syndrome. Waist circumference was not linked to metabolic syndrome in obese and overweight subjects; however, forearm circumference, an unconventional but simple and appropriate anthropometric index, was associated with metabolic syndrome and bioelectric impedance-measured visceral fat, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051607988

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24838901

DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(05)09

Related references

Anthropometric measurements as a potential non-invasive alternative for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome in adolescents. Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism 63(1): 30-39, 2019

A comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of anthropometric measurements to predict unhealthy metabolic phenotype in overweight and obese women. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome 12(6): 1147-1153, 2018

Anthropometric parameter that best predict metabolic syndrome in South west Nigeria. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome 13(1): 48-54, 2019

Anthropometric Indicators Predict Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 31(6): 841, 2016

Anthropometric Indicators Predict Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 31(3): 368-374, 2016

Classic anthropometric and body composition indicators can predict risk of metabolic syndrome in elderly. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism 60(4): 264-271, 2012

Anthropometric Indicators Predict Metabolic Syndrome Diagnosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: Methodological and Statistical Issues. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 31(6): 841, 2016

Analysis of several anthropometric measurements for the identification of metabolic syndrome, with or without disturbance of glucose metabolism. Arquivos Brasileiros de Endocrinologia e Metabologia 54(7): 636-643, 2010

Association of dietary patterns, anthropometric measurements, and metabolic parameters with C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in middle-aged and older adults with metabolic syndrome in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. Nutrition Journal 17(1): 106, 2018

Anthropometric measurements for assessing insulin sensitivity on patients with metabolic syndrome, sedentaries and marathoners. Conference Proceedings 2015: 4423-4426, 2015

Comparison of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness and anthropometric measurements in metabolic syndrome (MS) cases above and under the age of 65. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 52(2): E79-E84, 2011

Indices of Central and Peripheral Obesity; Anthropometric Measurements and Laboratory Parameters of Metabolic Syndrome and Thyroid Function. Balkan Medical Journal 32(4): 414-420, 2015

Association of Anthropometric Measurements with Components of Metabolic Syndrome and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Young Healthy Taiwanese. Journal of Medical Ultrasound 20(4), 2012

Anthropometric measurements for the prediction of the metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study on adolescents and young adults from southern india. Heart Asia 3(1): 2-7, 2011

Leptin concentrations in hirsute women with polycystic ovary syndrome or idiopathic hirsutism: influence on LH and relationship with hormonal, metabolic, and anthropometric measurements. Human Reproduction 16(7): 1340-1346, 2001