+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction



Appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction



Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 134(1): 13e



Implant rupture is one of the most important sequelae of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. The primary aim of this study was to compare magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation with intraoperative findings and provide a reliable description of the occurrence of each radiological sign. The authors prospectively recruited a consecutive series of 102 postmastectomy patients requiring implant change for aesthetic purposes. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound evaluation results were compared with intraoperative findings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and the overall accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in detecting ruptured implants were calculated, along with their corresponding 95 percent confidence intervals. Magnetic resonance imaging performs better than ultrasound for diagnosis of breast implant rupture, with overall accuracies of 94 and 72 percent, respectively. The negative predictive value of ultrasound was 85 percent, meaning that in the case of negative ultrasound findings, magnetic resonance imaging may be avoided. Teardrop sign and water droplets are the most common findings on magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging should be considered the method of choice for investigating silicone gel implant rupture in postmastectomy patients, and the standardization of magnetic resonance imaging criteria may improve magnetic resonance imaging accuracy. The authors therefore suggest a strategy of screening asymptomatic women with ultrasound every year and with magnetic resonance imaging every 5 years. Diagnostic, II.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051619942

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25028829

DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000000291


Related references

Discussion: appropriate use of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound to detect early silicone gel breast implant rupture in postmastectomy reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 134(1): 21e, 2014

Silicone Breast Implant Rupture: Pitfalls of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Relative Efficacies of Magnetic Resonance, Mammography, and Ultrasound. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 104(7): 2054-2062, 1999

Silicone breast implant rupture: pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography, and ultrasound. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 104(7): 2054-2062, 1999

Comparison of mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of silicone-gel breast implant rupture. Annals of Plastic Surgery 33(3): 247, 1994

Application of Breast Ultrasound Elastography to Differentiate Intracapsular Collection from Silicone-Induced Granuloma of Breast Implant Capsule Complementarily to Contrast-Enhanced Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Breast Cancer 11: 1178223417737994, 2017

The Life Span of Silicone Gel Breast Implants and a Comparison of Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Implant Rupture. Annals of Plastic Surgery 41(6): 577-586, 1998

The life span of silicone gel breast implants and a comparison of mammography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting implant rupture: a meta-analysis. Annals of Plastic Surgery 41(6): 577, 1998

The diagnosis of silicone breast-implant rupture: clinical findings compared with findings at magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Plastic Surgery 54(6): 583-589, 2005

Efficacy of ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting breast implant rupture: A retrospective study of 175 reconstructive and aesthetic sub-pectoral breast augmentation cases. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 70(11): 1520-1526, 2017

Calculation of silicone breast implant volumes using breast magnetic resonance imaging. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 29(4): 310-313, 2009

Ability of Dual-Energy CT to Detect Silicone Gel Breast Implant Rupture and Nodal Silicone Spread. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 212(4): 933-942, 2019

Detection of silicone-gel breast implant leakage by magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis and Rheumatism 36(9 Suppl. ): S71, 1993

Breast magnetic resonance imaging: tips for the diagnosis of silicone-induced granuloma of a breast implant capsule (SIGBIC). Insights into Imaging 8(4): 439-446, 2017

Comparative Silicone Breast Implant Evaluation Using Mammography, Sonography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 94(5): 620-627, 1994

Magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose breast implant rupture. European Journal of Plastic Surgery 25(5): 247-252, 2002