+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Assessment of intraosseous femoral head pressures during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femur nail antirotation blade



Assessment of intraosseous femoral head pressures during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femur nail antirotation blade



Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 28(7): 398-402



The benefits of cement augmentation with fixation of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures have been previously demonstrated. The objective of this study was 3-fold: (1) To quantify the intraosseous pressure produced during cement augmentation of the perforated proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) blades; (2) To assess whether the pressure generated is influenced by the injection rate; and (3) To assess the amount of force applied during the injection. Six pairs of human cadaveric femurs were used in the study. A basicervical osteotomy was performed, and the heads were instrumented with the PFNA blade. Each pair was randomly assigned into 1 of 2 groups: slow versus rapid injection with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cement. In the slow group, the augmentation was performed using 6 consecutive 1 mL injections, each over 10 seconds. In the rapid group, each 1 mL injection was performed over 5 seconds. For intraosseous pressure measurements, transmitters were inserted to a depth of 5 mm at both the superior and inferior apices of the head. The reaction forces on the syringe were measured as well. There were no significant differences between the slow and rapid injection rates with respect to the peak pressures measured at the 6 time points immediately after cement injection. In both groups, elevations in pressure were transient and returned to baseline values within 30 seconds. The highest pressure recorded in the slow group was 37.3 and 30.7 mm Hg in the rapid group. The force required after each sequential injection increased in both groups; however, significantly higher forces were required to inject cement over 5 than 10 seconds (P = 0.036). This in vitro model is the first one to demonstrate that femoral head cement augmentation is associated with a small transient increase in intraosseous pressure with sequential fast and slow 1 mL injections of up to 6 mL PMMA. We conclude that cement augmentation of the perforated PFNA blade carries a low risk of pressure-induced avascular necrosis.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051662222

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24464092

DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000069


Related references

Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation blade and reverse less invasive stabilization system-distal femur systems in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. Orthopaedic Surgery 3(1): 7, 2011

Treatment of Proximal Femur Osteomyelitis Occurred after Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Fixation, with Antibiotic Cement-coated Tibia Intramedullary Nail: A Case Report. Hip and Pelvis 30(1): 45-52, 2018

A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head: A cadaveric study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 48(3): 343, 2014

A biomechanical evaluation of proximal femoral nail antirotation with respect to helical blade position in femoral head: A cadaveric study. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 46(6): 627-632, 2012

Central head perforation, or "cut through," caused by the helical blade of the proximal femoral nail antirotation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 26(8): E102-E107, 2012

Biomechanical effect of bone cement augmentation on rotational stability and pull-out strength of the Proximal Femur Nail Antirotation™. Injury 42(11): 1322-1327, 2011

Ex vivo evaluation of the polymerization temperatures during cement augmentation of proximal femoral nail antirotation blades. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 72(4): 1098-1101, 2012

Cement augmentation of the Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) - A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Injury 49(8): 1436-1444, 2018

Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures--a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury 44(6): 802-807, 2013

Acetabular perforation after medial migration of the helical blade through the femoral head after treatment of an unstable trochanteric fracture with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA): a case report. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 25(9): E86-E89, 2011

Digital Assessment of the Implantation Angle of Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Helical Blade Using CT Three-dimensional Reconstruction. Journal of Investigative Surgery 32(2): 111-117, 2019

The Asia proximal femoral nail antirotation versus the standard proximal femoral antirotation nail for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly Chinese patients. Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery and Research 101(2): 143-146, 2015

Results and complications of pertrochanteric hip fractures using an intramedullary nail with a helical blade (proximal femoral nail antirotation) in 200 patients. Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica Y Traumatologia 57(3): 201-207, 2014

Results and complications of pertrochanteric hip fractures using an intramedullary nail with a helical blade proximal femoral nail antirotation in 200 patients. Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition) 57(3): 201-207, 2013

Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation Versus Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System-distal Femur for Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Meta-analysis. Medicine 95(14): E3168, 2016