+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Attitudes among stakeholders towards compulsory mental health care in Norway



Attitudes among stakeholders towards compulsory mental health care in Norway



International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34(1): 1-6



The Norwegian Mental Health Care Act allows use of coercion under certain conditions. Even though the current practice has been criticized, little empirical data exist about the attitudes towards compulsory mental health care. This study used Q-methodology to identify prototypical attitudes and to test possible differences of attitudes between groups of stakeholders towards the use of coercion in mental health care. Sixty-two respondents who represented six groups with different roles in mental health care participated: former patients, relatives of psychiatric patients, members of supervisory commissions, psychiatrists, other physicians, and lawyers. The participants were asked to assess the degree to which they agreed on 30 statements concerning use of coercion for the mentally ill. Three factors that in a meaningful way express different attitudes towards the question were found. The most widely shared attitude stated that a trusting relationship between patient and therapist is more important than the right to have an attorney. This attitude gives partial support to the present Mental Health Care Act. However, the second most common attitude argues that involuntary hospitalization, if necessary, should be decided in a court and not by the hospital doctor. Differences in attitude could partly be explained by the respondents' role in mental health care. Both psychiatrists and "somatic" physicians expressed more agreement with the present legislation than the other stakeholders. The findings may have implications for the legal protection of mental health care patients.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051709846

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21144587

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.11.001


Related references

Compulsory mental health care in Norway: the treatment criterion. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 37(2): 168-173, 2014

Potential legal protection problems in the use of compulsory commitment in mental health care in Norway. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34(6): 393-399, 2012

Attitudes towards mental health and the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a cross-sectional survey among health-care workers in Lvea Em District, Cambodia. Global Health Action 10(1): 1331579, 2017

What would it take? Stakeholders' views and preferences for implementing a health care manager program in community mental health clinics under health care reform. Medical Care Research and Review 72(1): 71-95, 2015

Personal attributes and competencies required by community health workers for a role in integrated mental health care for perinatal depression: voices of primary health care stakeholders from Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 12: 46, 2018

Attitudes about the VA health-care setting, mental illness, and mental health treatment and their relationship with VA mental health service use among female and male OEF/OIF veterans. Psychological Services 12(1): 49-58, 2015

The effectiveness of mental health-related theoretical education and clinical placement in mental health settings in changing the attitudes of health care students towards mental illness: A systematic review. Jbi Library of Systematic Reviews 10(58): 4019-4076, 2012

The Western Norway mental health interface study: a controlled intervention trial on referral letters between primary care and specialist mental health care. Bmc Psychiatry 11: 177, 2011

Psychological models of mental disorder, human rights, and compulsory mental health care in the community. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 31(6): 479-486, 2008

Involuntary Admission and Compulsory Treatment in Mental Health Services (I) || An Overview of Compulsory, Noncompulsory, and Coercive Interventions for Treating People with Mental Disorders in the United States. International Journal of Mental Health 37(3): 57-80, 2008

Mental health nursing and physical health care: a cross-sectional study of nurses' attitudes, practice, and perceived training needs for the physical health care of people with severe mental illness. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 22(5): 409-417, 2013

Psychiatric past history and health care after compulsory admission. Care use as an indicator of the quality of care for patients in compulsory care in Rotterdam. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 48(2): 81-93, 2006

Patientcentred care and compulsory admission to hospital: students consider communication skills in mental health care. Journal of Mental Health Training Education and Practice 4(4): 26-34, 2009

Less use of compulsory hospitalisation in mental health care?. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening 139(4):, 2019

Task shifting of mental health care services in Ghana: ease of referral, perception and concerns of stakeholders about quality of care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 27(5): 377-383, 2015