+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries

Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries

Bmc Medical Ethics 15: 42

Over the past two decades, the promotion of collaborative partnerships involving researchers from low and middle income countries with those from high income countries has been a major development in global health research. Ideally, these partnerships would lead to more equitable collaboration including the sharing of research responsibilities and rewards. While collaborative partnership initiatives have shown promise and attracted growing interest, there has been little scholarly debate regarding the fair distribution of authorship credit within these partnerships. In this paper, we identify four key authorship issues relevant to global health research and discuss their ethical and practical implications. First, we argue that authorship guidance may not adequately apply to global health research because it requires authors to write or substantially revise the manuscript. Since most journals of international reputation in global health are written in English, this would systematically and unjustly exclude non-English speaking researchers even if they have substantially contributed to the research project. Second, current guidance on authorship order does not address or mitigate unfair practices which can occur in global health research due to power differences between researchers from high and low-middle income countries. It also provides insufficient recognition of "technical tasks" such as local participant recruitment. Third, we consider the potential for real or perceived editorial bias in medical science journals in favour of prominent western researchers, and the risk of promoting misplaced credit and/or prestige authorship. Finally, we explore how diverse cultural practices and expectations regarding authorship may create conflict between researchers from low-middle and high income countries and contribute to unethical authorship practices. To effectively deal with these issues, we suggest: 1) undertaking further empirical and conceptual research regarding authorship in global health research; 2) raising awareness on authorship issues in global health research; and 3) developing specific standards of practice that reflect relevant considerations of authorship in global health research. Through review of the bioethics and global health literatures, and examination of guidance documents on ethical authorship, we identified a set of issues regarding authorship in collaborative partnerships between researchers from low-middle income countries and high income countries. We propose several recommendations to address these concerns.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051720162

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24885855

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-42

Related references

Perceptions and impact of plain packaging of tobacco products in low and middle income countries, middle to upper income countries and low-income settings in high-income countries: a systematic review of the literature. Bmj Open 6(3): E010391, 2016

Global Pediatric Oncology: Lessons From Partnerships Between High-Income Countries and Low- to Mid-Income Countries. Journal of Clinical Oncology 34(1): 53-61, 2016

Do attributes of persons with chronic kidney disease differ in low-income and middle-income countries compared with high-income countries? Evidence from population-based data in six countries. Bmj Global Health 2(4): E000453, 2017

Global Cancer Clinical Trials-Cooperation Between Investigators in High-Income Countries and Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA Oncology 4(6): 765-766, 2018

Social Epidemiology and Global Mental Health: Expanding the Evidence from High-Income to Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Current Epidemiology Reports 4(2): 166-173, 2017

Interventions to close the divide for women with breast and cervical cancer between low-income and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Lancet 389(10071): 861-870, 2017

HIV outcomes among migrants from low-income and middle-income countries living in high-income countries: a review of recent evidence. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, 2017

The Role of Academic Institutions in Global Health: Building Partnerships With Low- and Middle-Income Countries. JAMA Surgery 152(2): 123-124, 2017

Disease burden-research match? Registered trials in child health from low- and middle-income and high-income countries. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 53(7): 667-674, 2017

Comparing the Income Elasticity of Health Spending in Middle-Income and High-Income Countries: The Role of Financial Protection. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 7(3): 255-263, 2018

Moving from research ethics review to research ethics systems in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 373(9666): 862-865, 2009

Effect of GNI on Infant Mortality Rate in Low Income, Lower Middle Income, Upper Middle Income and High Income Countries. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration 39(2): 159-185, 2016

Enabling dynamic partnerships through joint degrees between low- and high-income countries for capacity development in global health research: experience from the Karolinska Institutet/Makerere University partnership. Plos Medicine 12(2): E1001784, 2015

The ethics of mental health survey research in low- and middle- income countries. Global Mental Health 3: E12, 2016

The ethics of health systems research in low- and middle-income countries: a call to action. Global Public Health 9(9): 1008-1022, 2014