+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Automatic anatomically selective image enhancement in digital chest radiography



Automatic anatomically selective image enhancement in digital chest radiography



IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 8(2): 154-162



A technique for automatic anatomically selective enhancement of digital chest radiographs is developed. Anatomically selective enhancement is motivated by the desire to simultaneously meet the different enhancement requirements of the lung field and the mediastinum. A recent peak detection algorithm and a set of rules are applied to the image histogram to determine automatically a gray-level threshold between the lung field and mediastinum. The gray-level threshold facilitates anatomically selective gray-scale modification and/or unsharp masking. Further, in an attempt to suppress possible white-band or black-band artifacts due to unsharp masking at sharp edges, local contrast adaptively is incorporated into anatomically selective unsharp masking by designing an anatomy-selective emphasis parameter which varies asymmetrically with positive and negative values of the local image contrast.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051727461

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18230512

DOI: 10.1109/42.24863


Related references

Digital chest radiography--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of chest lesions and anatomy. European Journal of Radiology 22(3): 241-245, 1996

Image quality of supine chest radiographs: intra-individual comparison of computed radiography and low-dose linear-slit digital radiography. European Radiology 19(9): 2156-2162, 2009

Comparison of Accuracy of Conventional Periapical Radiography and Direct Digital Subtractions Radiography with or without Image Enhancement in the Diagnosis of Density Changes. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 6(2): 54-58, 2012

Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: effect of digital parameters on the accuracy of computerized analysis of interstitial disease in digital chest radiographs. Medical Physics 17(1): 72-78, 1990

Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems. Clinical Imaging 36(4): 279-286, 2012

Comparison of scatter rejection and low-contrast performance of scan equalization digital radiography (SEDR), slot-scan digital radiography, and full-field digital radiography systems for chest phantom imaging. Medical Physics 38(1): 23-33, 2011

Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease in digital chest radiographs. Medical Physics 15(3): 311-319, 1988

Digital image processing in chest radiography. AJR (American Journal of Roentgenology) 145(3): 657, 1985

Principles of image processing in digital chest radiography. Journal of Thoracic Imaging 18(3): 148-164, 2003

Digital chest radiography with a large screen image intensifier. Electromedica (English Edition) 55(1): 21-27, 1987

Improved Bayesian image estimation for digital chest radiography. Medical Physics 24(4): 539-545, 1997

Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114(1-3): 269-272, 2005

Real time image enhancement of x ray digital radiography. Esser, P D (Ed ) Digital Imaging: Clinical Advances in Nuclear Medicine; 12th Annual Symposium on The Sharing Of Computer Programs And Technology in Nuclear Medicine, Xvi+304p The Society Of Nuclear Medicine, Inc : New York, N Y , Usa Illus Paper P105-112, 1982

Pseudocolor image enhancement in digital subtraction radiography. Journal of Dental Research 68(SPEC ISSUE): 359, 1989

Image processing in digital chest radiography effect on diagnostic efficacy. European Journal of Radiology 14(3): 164-168, 1992