+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey



Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey



BMJ Open 4(4): E004780



To gather information about current practices and implementation of publication guidelines among publication professionals working in or for the pharmaceutical industry. Web-based survey publicised via email and social media to members of the International Society for Medical Publication Professionals (ISMPP) and other organisations from November 2012 to February 2013. 469 individuals involved in publishing industry-sponsored research in peer-reviewed journals, mainly working in pharmaceutical or device companies ('industry', n=144), communication agencies ('agency', n=238), contract research organisations (CRO, n=15) or as freelancers (n=34). Most respondents (78%) had worked on medical publications for ≥5 years and 62% had a PhD/MD. Over 90% of industry, agency and CRO respondents routinely refer to Good Publication Practice (GPP2) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' Uniform Requirements. Most respondents (78% industry, 79% agency) received mandatory training on ethical publication practices. Over 90% of respondents' companies had publication guidelines or policies and required medical writing support to be acknowledged in publications (96% industry, 99% agency). Many industry respondents used publication management tools to monitor compliance with company guidelines and about half (46%) stated that their company had formal publication audits. Fewer agencies audited adherence to guidelines but 20% of agency respondents reported audits of employees and 6% audits of freelancers. Of concern, 37% of agency respondents reported requests from authors or sponsors that they believed were unethical, although 93% of these requests were withdrawn after respondents explained the need for compliance with guidelines. Most respondents' departments (63% industry, 58% agency, 60% CRO) had been involved in publishing studies with negative or inconclusive results. Within this sample, most publication professionals working in or for industry were aware of, and applying, major publication guidelines. However, the survey also identified specific areas where education and promotion of guidelines are needed to ensure ethical publication practices.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051736061

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24747794

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004780


Related references

Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339(Nov27 1): B4330-B4330, 2009

Research Methods & Reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339: B4330, 2009

Implications of 2015 guidelines on good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research. Maturitas 88: 1-2, 2016

Publication bias in pharmaceutical industry-sponsored research. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 28(6): 1024, 1993

Publication standards for clinical research sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica 14(1): 62-66, 2003

Bias in the design, interpretation, and publication of industry-sponsored clinical research. Minnesota Medicine 91(6): 46-47, 2008

Awareness of publication guidelines and the responsible conduct of research. Accountability in Research 12(3): 193-206, 2006

Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3. Annals of Internal Medicine 163(6): 461-464, 2015

Cross-sectional study of Pfizer-sponsored clinical trials: assessment of time to publication and publication history. BMJ Open 6(7): E012362, 2017

High nonpublication rate from publication professionals hinders evidence-based publication practices. Peerj 4: E2011, 2016

Independent or codependent?-industry, academics, and the publication of medical research. Annals of Translational Medicine 6(Suppl 2): S115, 2019

Enhancing transparency and efficiency in reporting industry-sponsored clinical research: report from the Medical Publishing Insights and Practices initiative. International Journal of Clinical Practice 64(8): 1028-1033, 2011

Publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. New England Journal of Medicine 328(16): 1197; Author Reply 1197-8, 1993

The publication of sponsored symposiums in medical journals. New England Journal of Medicine 327(16): 1135-1140, 1992

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 46(3): 217-221, 2001