+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Bootstrap confidence intervals and bias correction in the estimation of HIV incidence from surveillance data with testing for recent infection

Bootstrap confidence intervals and bias correction in the estimation of HIV incidence from surveillance data with testing for recent infection

Statistics in Medicine 30(8): 854-865

The incidence of new infections is a key measure of the status of the HIV epidemic, but accurate measurement of incidence is often constrained by limited data. Karon et al. (Statist. Med. 2008; 27:4617–4633) developed a model to estimate the incidence of HIV infection from surveillance data with biologic testing for recent infection for newly diagnosed cases. This method has been implemented by public health departments across the United States and is behind the new national incidence estimates, which are about 40 per cent higher than previous estimates. We show that the delta method approximation given for the variance of the estimator is incomplete, leading to an inflated variance estimate. This contributes to the generation of overly conservative confidence intervals, potentially obscuring important differences between populations. We demonstrate via simulation that an innovative model-based bootstrap method using the specified model for the infection and surveillance process improves confidence interval coverage and adjusts for the bias in the point estimate. Confidence interval coverage is about 94–97 per cent after correction, compared with 96–99 per cent before. The simulated bias in the estimate of incidence ranges from −6.3 to +14.6 per cent under the original model but is consistently under 1 per cent after correction by the model-based bootstrap. In an application to data from King County, Washington in 2007 we observe correction of 7.2 per cent relative bias in the incidence estimate and a 66 per cent reduction in the width of the 95 per cent confidence interval using this method. We provide open-source software to implement the method that can also be extended for alternate models.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051848302

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21432879

DOI: 10.1002/sim.4134

Related references

Bootstrap confidence intervals for red spruce ring width chronologies and an assessment of age related bias in recent growth trends. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20(9): 1326-1331, 1990

Bootstrap estimation of confidence intervals on mutation rate ratios. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 52(5): 385-396, 2011

The Effects of Nonnormal Distributions on Confidence Intervals Around the Standardized Mean Difference: Bootstrap and Parametric Confidence Intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement 65(1): 51-69, 2005

Finite strain estimation using the mean radial length of elliptical objects with bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of Structural Geology 25(4): 529-539, 2003

Double block bootstrap confidence intervals for dependent data. Biometrika 96(2): 427-443, 2009

Approximate Confidence Intervals: III. A Bias Correction. Biometrika 42(1-2): 201-204, 1955

Using the bootstrap to improve estimation and confidence intervals for regression coefficients selected using backwards variable elimination. Statistics in Medicine 27(17): 3286-3300, 2008

Empirical bootstrap bias correction and estimation of prediction mean square error in small area estimation. Biometrika 99(2): 457-472, 2012

Bootstrap confidence intervals for percentiles of reliability data for wood-plastic composites. Forest Products Journal: 11, 106-114, 2008

Bootstrap confidence intervals for relative risk parameters in affected-sib-pair data. Genetic Epidemiology 18(2): 157-172, 2000

Bootstrap approach for constructing confidence intervals for population pharmacokinetic parameters. I: A use of bootstrap standard error. Statistics in Medicine 18(5): 581-599, 1999

Bootstrap resampling: A powerful method of assessing confidence intervals for doses from experimental data. Physics in Medicine & Biology 44(4): N55-N62, 1999

Bootstrap confidence intervals for effective doses in the probit model for dose response data. Biometrical Journal 32(5): 529-544, 1990

Determination of confidence intervals in non-normal data: application of the bootstrap to cocaine concentration in femoral blood. Journal of Analytical Toxicology 39(2): 113-117, 2015

On the accuracy of bootstrap confidence intervals for efficiency levels in stochastic frontier models with panel data. Journal of Productivity Analysis 28(3): 165-181, 2007