+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cigarette company trade secrets are not secret: an analysis of reverse engineering reports in internal tobacco industry documents released as a result of litigation

Cigarette company trade secrets are not secret: an analysis of reverse engineering reports in internal tobacco industry documents released as a result of litigation

Tobacco Control 24(5): 469-480

Use previously secret tobacco industry documents to assess tobacco companies' routine claims of trade secret protection for information on cigarette ingredients, additives and construction made to regulatory agencies, as well as the companies' refusal to publicly disclose this information. We analysed previously secret tobacco industry documents available at (http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu) to identify 100 examples of seven major tobacco companies' reverse engineering of their competitors' brands between 1937 and 2001. These reverse engineering reports contain detailed data for 142 different measurements for at least two companies, including physical parameters of the cigarettes, tobacco types, humectants, additives, flavourings, and smoke constituents of competitors' cigarettes. These 100 documents were distributed to 564 employees, including top managers in domestic and foreign offices across multiple departments, including executive leadership, research and design, product development, marketing and legal. These documents reported new competitors' products, measured ingredient changes over time, and informed companies' decisions regarding ingredients in their own products. Because cigarette companies routinely analyse their competitors' cigarettes in great detail, this information is neither secret nor commercially valuable and, thus, does not meet the legal definition of a 'trade secret.' This information is only being kept 'secret' from the people consuming cigarettes and the scientific community. Public agencies should release this detailed information because it would provide valuable information about how ingredients affect addictiveness and toxicity, and would help the public health community and consumers better understand the impact of cigarette design on human health.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052086468

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24920577

DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051571

Related references

Transnational tobacco company interests in smokeless tobacco in Europe: analysis of internal industry documents and contemporary industry materials. Plos Medicine 10(9): E1001506, 2013

The toxic effects of cigarette additives. Philip Morris' project mix reconsidered: an analysis of documents released through litigation. Plos Medicine 8(12): E1001145, 2011

Differences in reporting of analyses in internal company documents versus published trial reports: comparisons in industry-sponsored trials in off-label uses of gabapentin. Plos Medicine 10(1): E1001378, 2013

The tobacco industry and underage youth smoking: tobacco industry documents from the Minnesota litigation. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 153(9): 935-941, 1999

Tax, price and cigarette smoking: evidence from the tobacco documents and implications for tobacco company marketing strategies. Tobacco Control 11(Suppl. 1): I62-I72, 2002

Tobacco industry promotions and pricing after tax increases: An analysis of internal industry documents. Nicotine and Tobacco Research 2019:, 2019

More secret tobacco industry documents revealed. BMJ 316(7149): 1923-1923, 1998

"Working the system"--British American tobacco's influence on the European union treaty and its implications for policy: an analysis of internal tobacco industry documents. Plos Medicine 7(1): E1000202-E1000202, 2010

Tobacco industry efforts at discrediting scientific knowledge of environmental tobacco smoke: a review of internal industry documents. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 55(8): 588-594, 2001

The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents. Addiction 108(9): 1658-1668, 2013

Tobacco industry manipulation of tobacco excise and tobacco advertising policies in the Czech Republic: an analysis of tobacco industry documents. Plos Medicine 9(6): E1001248, 2012

Learning from Philip Morris: Japan Tobacco's strategies regarding evidence of tobacco health harms as revealed in internal documents from the American tobacco industry. Lancet 363(9423): 1820-1824, 2004

Barbarians inside the gate: How the tobacco industry penetrated the World Health Organization: Report of the Committee of Experts on Tobacco Industry Documents. Tobacco company strategies to undermine tobacco control activities at the World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000, pp. 247. International Journal of Epidemiology 30(3): 633-634, 2001

The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tobacco Control 11(Suppl. 1): I73-I80, 2002

Can internal tobacco industry documents be useful for studying the UK alcohol industry?. Bmc Public Health 18(1): 808, 2018