+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)



Cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) with or without cilengitide in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of the randomized phase I/II ADVANTAGE trial (phase II part)



Annals of Oncology 25(3): 682-688



Recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN) overexpresses αvβ5 integrin. Cilengitide selectively inhibits αvβ3 and αvβ5 integrins and is investigated as a treatment strategy. The phase I/II study ADVANTAGE evaluated cilengitide combined with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab (PFE) in R/M-SCCHN. The phase II part reported here was an open-label, randomized, controlled trial investigating progression-free survival (PFS). Patients received up to six cycles of PFE alone or combined with cilengitide 2000 mg once (CIL1W) or twice (CIL2W) weekly. Thereafter, patients received maintenance therapy (cilengitide arms: cilengitide plus cetuximab; PFE-alone arm: cetuximab only) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. One hundred and eighty-two patients were treated. Median PFS per investigator read was similar for CIL1W + PFE, CIL2W + PFE, and PFE alone (6.4, 5.6, and 5.7 months, respectively). Accordingly, median overall survival and objective response rates were not improved with cilengitide (12.4 months/47%, 10.6 months/27%, and 11.6 months/36%, respectively). No clinically meaningful safety differences were observed between groups. None of the tested biomarkers (expression of integrins, CD31, Ki-67, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2, vascular endothelial-cadherin, type IV collagen, epidermal growth factor receptor, or p16 for human papillomavirus) were predictive of outcome. Neither of the cilengitide-containing regimens demonstrated a PFS benefit over PFE alone in R/M-SCCHN patients.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052093024

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24567516

DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu003


Related references

Phase Ib trial of the Toll-like receptor 9 agonist IMO-2055 in combination with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and cetuximab as first-line palliative treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Investigational New Drugs 31(5): 1207-1216, 2014

Phase I/II study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and fluorouracil in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Journal of Clinical Oncology 24(18): 2866-2872, 2006

Phase I study of cetuximab in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. EJC Supplements 1(5): S34, September, 2003

Randomized phase II trial of cixutumumab alone or with cetuximab for refractory recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncology 82: 83-90, 2018

A randomized, phase 2 study of cetuximab plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Annals of Oncology 28(11): 2820-2826, 2017

Cetuximab plus platinum-based therapy first-line in recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): Efficacy and safety results of a randomized phase III trial (EXTREME). EJC Supplements 5(4): 324, 2007

Phase II clinical study of valproic acid plus cisplatin and cetuximab in recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of Head and Neck-V-CHANCE trial. Bmc Cancer 16(1): 918-918, 2016

Randomized comparison of cisplatin, methotrexate, bleomycin and vincristine (CABO) versus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus cisplatin (C) in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase III study of the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group. Annals of Oncology 5(6): 521-526, 1994

Phase ii trial of a combination of low dose cisplatin and bolus 5 fluorouracil in recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy 18(SUPPL): S14, 1984

Phase II trial of a combination of low dose cisplatin (DDP) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (FU) in recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. European Journal of Cancer & Clinical Oncology 22(7): 891-892, 1986

Treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma with a combination of vinorelbine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil: a multicenter phase II trial. Annals of Oncology 6(10): 987-991, 1995

Phase 2, open-label, 1:1 randomized controlled trial exploring the efficacy of EMD 1201081 in combination with cetuximab in second-line cetuximab-naïve patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). Investigational New Drugs 32(6): 1278-1284, 2015

Cisplatin and fluorouracil with or without panitumumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SPECTRUM): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet. Oncology 14(8): 697-710, 2013

A phase 2 trial of induction nab-paclitaxel and cetuximab given with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 119(4): 766-773, 2013

Final Results of a Multi-institutional Phase II Trial of Re-Irradiation with Concurrent Weekly Cisplatin and Cetuximab for Recurrent or Second Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. Annals of Oncology, 2018