+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Collaborative mental health care versus care as usual in a primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial

Collaborative mental health care versus care as usual in a primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial

Psychiatric Services 60(1): 74-79

This study compared the effectiveness of treating common mental disorders in a collaborative care program in a primary care setting and the effectiveness of treating such disorders through traditional referral of patients to mental health services. In a cluster randomized controlled trial, 27 general practitioner practices in the Netherlands were designated to provide either collaborative care or usual care. In the collaborative care condition, a mental health care professional worked on site at the primary care practice and was available to provide patients a maximum of five appointments if they were referred by the general practitioner. If indicated, referral to specialized mental health services followed. In the usual care condition, if indicated, general practitioners would refer patients to off-site specialized mental health services. The study included 165 patients. At baseline and at three, six, and 12 months, the study assessed patients' psychopathology, patients' quality of life, and patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction with the treatment provided. Delay in seeing a mental health provider, duration of treatment, number of appointments, and related treatment costs were assessed at 12 months. The data were analyzed with hierarchical linear models. Level of patients' psychopathology and quality of life significantly improved over time, and there were no significant differences between models of care. There was no significant difference in patients' satisfaction with care in either condition. The collaborative care condition resulted in significantly higher satisfaction with services among general practitioners, shorter referral delay, reduced time in treatment, fewer appointments, and consequently lower treatment costs. Collaborative care for a heterogeneous group of persons with common mental disorders seems to be as effective as the usual practice of referral to mental health services for reducing psychopathology, but it is significantly more efficient regarding referral delay, duration of treatment, number of appointments, and related treatment costs.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052164990

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19114574

DOI: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.1.74

Related references

Increasing return-to-work among people on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of a problem-solving intervention versus care-as-usual conducted in the Swedish primary health care system (PROSA). Bmc Public Health 18(1): 889, 2018

Impact of a collaborative care model on depression in a primary care setting: A randomized controlled trial. Pharmacotherapy 23(9): 1175-1185, 2003

Clinical effectiveness of care managers in collaborative care for patients with depression in Swedish primary health care: a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. Bmc Family Practice 19(1): 28, 2018

Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(22): 2836-2845, 2002

Cost-effectiveness of multidisciplinary collaborative care versus usual care in the management of high-risk patients with diabetes in Singapore: Short-term results from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 43(6): 775-783, 2018

Study protocol for a randomized, controlled, superiority trial comparing the clinical and cost- effectiveness of integrated online mental health assessment-referral-care in pregnancy to usual prenatal care on prenatal and postnatal mental health and infant health and development: the Integrated Maternal Psychosocial Assessment to Care Trial (IMPACT). Trials 15: 72, 2014

Randomised controlled trial: Telephone-delivered collaborative care for post-CABG depression is more effective than usual care for improving mental-health-related quality of life. Evidence-Based Medicine 15(2): 57-58, 2010

Cluster randomized controlled trial of a simple warfarin maintenance dosing algorithm versus usual care among primary care practices. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 37(4): 435-442, 2014

Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of home-based primary care versus usual care for high-risk homebound older adults. Contemporary Clinical Trials 68: 90-94, 2018

Cost-effectiveness of problem-solving treatment in comparison with usual care for primary care patients with mental health problems: a randomized trial. Bmc Family Practice 13: 98, 2012

A technology-assisted health coaching intervention vs. enhanced usual care for Primary Care-Based Obesity Treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Bmc Obesity 6: 4, 2019

Collaborative stepped care v. care as usual for common mental disorders: 8-month, cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 203(2): 132-139, 2013

Training primary health care workers in mental health and its impact on diagnoses of common mental disorders in primary care of a developing country, Malawi: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine 44(3): 657-666, 2014

A sensitivity analysis of the Children's Treatment Network trial: a randomized controlled trial of integrated services versus usual care for children with special health care needs. Clinical Epidemiology 5: 373-385, 2013

Improving the outcomes of primary care attenders with common mental disorders in developing countries: a cluster randomized controlled trial of a collaborative stepped care intervention in Goa, India. Trials 9: 4, 2008