+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative safety of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair over open repair using patient safety indicators during adoption



Comparative safety of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair over open repair using patient safety indicators during adoption



JAMA Surgery 149(9): 926-932



In 2003, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality established Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs) to monitor preventable adverse events during hospitalizations. To evaluate the comparative safety of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) vs open aneurysm repair (OAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm by measuring PSIs associated with each procedure over time. Cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair were extracted from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2010). Patient Safety Indicators were calculated using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality software (Win QI, version 4.4). Unadjusted analysis included year, age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidities, rupture status, hospital teaching status, and emergency status. Multivariable analysis was stratified by year for any PSI in EVAR vs OAR. Postoperative mortality was analyzed to control for the overall safety. Patient Safety Indicators and mortality. In total, 43,385 EVARs and 27,561 OARs were documented, with 1289 (3.0%) and 3094 (11.2%) associated PSIs, respectively. Compared with those receiving OAR, patients receiving EVAR were more likely to be male, older, and of white race/ethnicity; have a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index; and seek care at teaching hospitals (P < .001 for all). Patients were less likely to have a PSI after EVAR than after OAR. Overall, multivariable analysis showed that EVAR was associated with a 42.1% decrease in the risk-adjusted odds of any PSI compared with OAR (odds ratio, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51-0.65). Stratified by year, the risk-adjusted odds of any PSI after EVAR were comparatively less likely than after OAR every year except for 2007, and the odds of death were comparatively less every year. The annual percentage of PSIs among all aortic repairs decreased from 7.4% in 2003 to 4.4% in 2010, while the proportion of total repairs that were EVARs increased from 41.1% in 2003 to 75.3% in 2010. Patient Safety Indicators can be used to monitor the comparative safety of emerging surgical technologies. Herein, EVAR was safer than OAR. The adoption of minimally invasive technology can improve safety among surgical admissions.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052216509

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25007317

DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1018


Related references

Comparative Safety of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair Over Open Repair Using Patient Safety Indicators During Adoption. Journal of Vascular Surgery 61(3): 835-836, 2015

RS01. Hospital Volume Impact on Patient Safety Indicators and Failure to Rescue Following Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 65(6): 45s-46s, 2017

Hybrid repair of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm in a patient with previous endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of Vascular Surgery 59(2): 524, 2014

A Comparative Study of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Aneurysm Repair versus Open Repair. Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 50(4): 263-269, 2017

Validation of Patient Selection for Endovascular Aneurysm Repair or Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm – Single-Center Study. Circulation Journal 79(8): 1699-1705, 2015

Comparative analysis of open surgical repair and endovascular aortic repair in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm implicated visceral arteries. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 97(32): 2506-2509, 2017

Comparative study of perioperative outcome between endovascular repair and open surgical repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 53(9): 696-699, 2015

Clinical Outcomes of Total Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Aortic Aneurysms Involving the Proximal Anastomotic Aneurysm following Initial Open Repair for Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. Annals of Vascular Surgery 49: 123-133, 2018

Comparative safety of endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in low-risk male patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 60(5): 1154-1158, 2014

Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians before and after the adoption of endovascular grafting procedures. Journal of Vascular Surgery 47(1): 23-30, 2008

Volume Outcome Relationship for Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair and Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in United States Medicare Patients. Journal of Vascular Surgery 51(2): 530-531, 2010

Early and Late Outcomes of Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair versus Open Surgical Repair of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Single-Center Study. Annals of Vascular Surgery 51: 187-191, 2018

Images for surgeons. Concomitant open surgical repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm and endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 190(6): 751, 2000

Perioperative outcomes for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair since the adoption of endovascular grafting procedures. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 42(2): 178-184, 2011

Endovascular Aneurysm Repair or Open Aneurysm Repair for the Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm - The Latest Update. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny 88(3): 166-174, 2016