+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic review



Comparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic review



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 29(2): 311-320



This study aimed to compare the values of removal torque (RT) and bone-implant contact (BIC) reported in different animal studies for zirconia and titanium implants. A systematic review of the literature was performed to analyze BIC and RT of animal studies in which both zirconia and titanium dental implants were used. To identify the studies to include in this systematic review, an exhaustive search of PubMed was performed of animal studies published in English with reports on the quantification of the osseointegration of both titanium and zirconia implants by means of BIC and/or RT. The results were aggregated and analyzed within each of the animal models (pig, rabbit, rat, monkey, dog, and sheep). The selection process resulted in a final sample of 16 studies. In general, no significant differences were found between titanium and zirconia. The significant differences in terms of BIC and RT reported by the authors were attributable to the different surface treatments and microporosities of the implant surfaces studied, not to the materials themselves. Only two articles reported significantly lower BIC for modified zirconia implants as compared to modified titanium implants. Four authors described statistically significant differences in terms of RT between zirconia and titanium implants in the different animal models, regardless of the surface treatment received by the implants. Within the limitations of this study, the values for the BIC and RT of zirconia implants in most of the studies analyzed did not show statistical differences compared with titanium implants. Modified-surface zirconia may have potential as a candidate for a successful implant material, although further clinical studies are necessary.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052230961

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24683556

DOI: 10.11607/jomi.2817


Related references

Clinical performance of one-piece zirconia dental implants: A systematic review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry 10(2): E12384, 2019

Comparison of surface modified zirconia implants with commercially available zirconium and titanium implants: a histological study in pigs. Implant Dentistry 23(4): 502-507, 2014

Zirconia Implants as an Alternative to Titanium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 32(3): E125–e134, 2017

Clinical Performance of Narrow-Diameter Titanium-Zirconium Implants: A Systematic Review. Implant Dentistry 26(2): 316-323, 2017

Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 30(5): 365-395, 2019

Clinical performance of intentionally tilted implants versus axially positioned implants: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 29(Suppl. 16): 78-105, 2018

Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(Suppl. 4): 32-47, 2009

Osseointegration of zirconia dental implants in animal investigations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dental Materials 34(2): 171-182, 2018

A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clinical Oral Investigations 20(7): 1403-1417, 2016

Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Systematic Review. Journal of Dental Research 96(1): 38-46, 2017

Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: a systematic review. International Journal of Prosthodontics 21(1): 27-36, 2008

Comparison of Clinical and Histologic Outcomes of Zirconia Versus Titanium Implants Placed in Fresh Sockets: A 5-Month Study in Beagles. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2015:, 2015

Experimental peri-implant mucositis around titanium and zirconia implants in comparison to a natural tooth: part 2-clinical and microbiological parameters. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 48(4): 560-565, 2019

Soft tissue healing at one-piece zirconia implants compared to titanium and PEEK implants of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 33(5): 669-677, 2013

Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants Modified by Femtosecond Laser versus Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study in Fox Hound Dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 17(3): 525-532, 2015