+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation



Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation



Simulation in Healthcare 4(3): 160-165



A number of devices, including video laryngoscopy, are used to aid in managing difficult airways. The goal of this study was to compare timing and success of video laryngoscopy to standard laryngoscopic intubation using a simulation mannequin in normal and difficult airway scenarios. Residents and attending physicians of a PGY 2-4 emergency medicine residency program participated. A single, high-fidelity simulation mannequin was used. Each participant received an in-service on the video laryngoscope (GlideScope). Three airway settings were used: standard, decreased neck mobility, and tongue edema. Participants intubated with a Macintosh blade and video laryngoscope in each scenario, and graded the best view achieved using the Cormack-Lehane classification. Outcome measures included time to view the vocal cords, time to intubation, grading of view, and intubation success or failure. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. Fifty-two participants were enrolled. Participants successfully intubated the mannequin faster using the Macintosh blade in both the normal and neck immobility settings (9.4 seconds faster, 95% CI 3.2-15.7, P = 0.004, 16.1 seconds faster, 95% CI 3.6-28.7, P = 0.01). In the tongue edema setting, however, video laryngoscopy provided a better grade view of the cords, a higher success rate of viewing the cords at time of intubation (50% vs. 12%), and a higher rate of successful intubations (83% vs. 23%). The GlideScope also significantly reduced the time needed to view the cords (89 seconds reduction, 95% CI 54.4-123.7, P < 0.0001) and intubate (131.3 seconds reduction, 95% CI 99.1-163.6, P< 0.0001) for the tongue edema setting. In the most difficult airway case, tongue edema, the video laryngoscope provided an enhanced view of the cords using less time, increased intubation success, and decreased the time to intubation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052236712

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19680083

DOI: 10.1097/sih.0b013e318197d2e5


Related references

Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Internal and Emergency Medicine 9(1): 93-98, 2014

First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy. Anesthesia & Analgesia 122(3): 740-750, 2016

First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients With Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy. Survey of Anesthesiology 60(4): 149-150, 2016

First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population. Anesthesia and Analgesia 122(3): 740-750, 2016

Expected difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective comparison of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy in 200 patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 102(4): 546-550, 2009

Intubation Efficiency and Perceived Ease of Use of Video Laryngoscopy vs Direct Laryngoscopy While Wearing HazMat PPE: A Preliminary High-fidelity Mannequin Study. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 30(3): 259-263, 2015

Comparison of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy in Intubating a Mannequin: Should Video Laryngoscopy Be Available to Manage Airway Emergencies in the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Office?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 73(10): 1901-1906, 2015

A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine 16(9): 866-871, 2009

Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine 43(3): 636-641, 2015

Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in emergency department patients with cardiac arrest: A multicentre study. Resuscitation 136: 70-77, 2019

Comparison of success rates using video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy by residents during a simulated pediatric emergency. Simulation in Healthcare 8(3): 155-161, 2014

Endotracheal intubation with a gum-elastic bougie in unanticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: comparison of a blind technique versus indirect laryngoscopy with a laryngeal mirror. Anesthesia and Analgesia 95(4): 1090-3, Table of Contents, 2002

Video Laryngoscopy vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Teaching Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation: A Simulation-Based Study. Cureus 9(1): E962, 2017

Just-in-Time Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Neonatal Intubation. Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing 30(4): 367-371, 2016

Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for first-attempt tracheal intubation in the general ward. Annals of Intensive Care 8(1): 83, 2018