+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of near fusional vergence ranges with rotary prisms and with prism bars



Comparison of near fusional vergence ranges with rotary prisms and with prism bars



Optometry 82(2): 104-107



Common methods for determination of fusional vergence ranges make use of rotary prisms in the phoropter or prism bars out of the phoropter. This study compared near fusional vergence ranges with rotary prisms with those with prism bars. Fifty young adults served as subjects. Odd-numbered subjects had rotary prism vergences performed before prism bar vergences. For even-numbered subjects, prism bar vergences were done first. Base-in (BI) vergences were done before base-out (BO) vergences with both rotary prisms and prism bars. A coefficient of agreement was calculated by multiplying the standard deviation of the individual subject differences between rotary prisms and prism bars by 1.96, to approximate the range within which the 2 tests would agree 95% of the time. The lowest coefficient of agreement was 7.3Δ for the BI recovery. The others were high, ranging from 15.4Δ for the BO recovery to 19.5Δ for the BO break. Fusional vergence ranges determined by prism bars out of the phoropter cannot be used interchangeably with those determined by phoropter rotary prisms for the purpose of follow-up on individual patients or for the purpose of comparison with norms.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052238816

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21144803

DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2010.09.011


Related references

Reliability of rotary prism fusional vergence ranges. Optometry 72(2): 117-122, 2001

Comparison of fusional ranges measured by Risley prisms, vectograms, and computer orthopter. Optometry and Vision Science 66(6): 375-382, 1989

Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?. Plos One 7(8): E42832-E42832, 2013

Vergence adaptive changes with varying magnitudes of prism-induced disparities and fusional amplitudes. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 64(4): 263-268, 1987

Fusional vergence detected by prism bar and synoptophore in chinese childhood intermittent exotropia. Journal of Ophthalmology 2015: 987048-987048, 2015

Vertical fusional vergence ranges of the rhesus monkey. Vision Research 20(1): 83-85, 1980

Fusional vergence ranges of the monkey a behavioral study. Experimental Brain Research 37(1): 87-92, 1979

Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age. Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 244(7): 821-824, 2005

Objective Measurement of Fusional Vergence Ranges and Heterophoria in Infants and Preschool Children. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 57(6): 2678-2688, 2016

Effect of vergence adaptation and positive fusional vergence training on oculomotor parameters. Optometry and Vision Science 87(7): 487-493, 2010

The nature of vergence revealed by electromyography. II. Accommodative and fusional vergence. A.M.A. Archives of Ophthalmology 58(5): 623-631, 1957

Fusional vergence. American Journal of Optometry & Archives of American Academy of Optometry 49(10): 880, 1972

Fusional vergence in microstrabismus. Documenta Ophthalmologica 70(2-3): 221-226, 1988

Automaticity in fusional vergence therapy. Journal of the American Optometric Association 66(8): 471-478, 1995

Accommodative and fusional vergence in anomalous correspondence. American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics 57(9): 676-680, 1980