+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Compound motor action potential interexaminer variability in photoguided placement of the recording electrodes



Compound motor action potential interexaminer variability in photoguided placement of the recording electrodes



Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 29(3): 256-259



Interpretation of neurographic data in follow-up studies of patients with neuromuscular disease is sometimes challenging because of the expected variability in repeated tests. In this study, we explored whether the interexaminer variability of the compound motor action potential (CMAP) amplitude is reduced if the examiner is guided by the previously taken photographs of the position of the recording electrodes. The CMAPs were recorded from 20 subjects by unilateral distal stimulation of the median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial nerve by 4 different technicians. All the subjects were examined on 2 occasions (∼1 week apart). On the first occasion, the technicians recorded the CMAP values according to routine protocols. On the second occasion, the technicians had additional guidance from photographs displaying the recording electrode positions from the first study. The CMAP coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated for each nerve examined by the four technicians. Differences in CoV between the two types of tests (i.e., with or without photographs) were evaluated. When the examiners were guided by the photographs during electrode application, the CMAP CoV for the tibial innervated abductor hallucis (AH) muscle was reduced (P = 0.02) from 18.5% to 13%. There were, however, no significant reductions in CoV for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB, P = 0.23, median nerve), abductor digiti minimi (P = 0.37, ulnar nerve), or extensor digitorum brevis (EDB, P = 0.15, peroneal nerve) muscles. Photographic documentation of the CMAP recording electrodes seems to have a limited overall effect on interexaminer variability in a subsequent study.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269181

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22659720

DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e3182570f6e


Related references

Optimal placement of recording electrodes for quantifying facial nerve compound muscle action potential. Otology & Neurotology 29(5): 710-713, 2008

A new electrode placement for recording the compound motor action potential of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Neurophysiologie Clinique 41(4): 173-180, 2012

Recording of corticospinal evoked potential for optimum placement of motor cortex stimulation electrodes in the treatment of post-stroke pain. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 47(9): 409-414, 2007

Compound motor action potential recording distinguishes differential onset of motor block of the obturator nerve in response to etidocaine or bupivacaine. Anesthesia and Analgesia 82(2): 317-320, 1996

Impedance changes in compound nerves during the action potential Implications for non-invasive recording of C fibre activity with skin electrodes. Journal of Physiology (Cambridge) 518P: 70P, July, 1999

Motor electroneurography simultaneous recording of evoked muscle action potential with surface and concentric needle electrodes comparing investigations of proximal and distal latency and of motor nerve conduction velocity. Eeg-Emg 21(1): 51-55, 1990

Assessment of cortical motor output: Compound muscle action potential versus twitch force recording. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 97(2): 131-139, 1995

Interexaminer variance of median nerve compound muscle action potential measurements in hand position with and without fixation in plaster. Journal of Clinical Neuromuscular Disease 10(2): 37-41, 2009

Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology 30(3): 165-168, 1990

Propagation of compound muscle action potentials measured with small surface recording electrodes. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology 27(6-7): 415-417, 1987

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials combined with response recording through compound muscle action potential as the sole modality of spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery. Spine 33(10): 1100-1106, 2008

Compound nerve action potentials as related to type and size of recording electrodes a model simulation study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 56(3): 0, 1983

Recording of sensory action potential of digital nerves using needle electrodes. Revue Neurologique 120(6): 432-435, 1969

Motor nerve neurography with simultaneous recording of evoked muscle action potentials emap with surface and concentric needle electrodes a comparison. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 66(5): S3, 1987