+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Compounding vs standardized commercial parenteral nutrition product: pros and cons



Compounding vs standardized commercial parenteral nutrition product: pros and cons



Jpen. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 36(2 Suppl.): 40s-41s



Standardized commercial parenteral nutrition (PN) formulations have advantages and disadvantages as compared with PN formulations compounded using an automated compounding device. These advantages and disadvantages are discussed along with the supporting available research.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269391

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22301324

DOI: 10.1177/0148607111435331


Related references

Standardized Competencies for Parenteral Nutrition Order Review and Parenteral Nutrition Preparation, Including Compounding: The ASPEN Model. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 31(4): 548-555, 2017

Pros and cons of treating anorexia with parenteral nutrition. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 93(12): 1381, 1993

Basics of compounding: considerations for implementing United States pharmacopeia chapter 797 pharmaceutical compounding-sterile preparations, part 18: verification of automated compounding devices for parenteral nutrition compounding and finished preparation release checks and tests. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding 14(2): 142-149, 2010

Commercial Clinical Laboratories: Pros and Cons. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 64: 1118-1120, 1965

Pros and cons in the application of sex linked dwarfism in commercial broiler breeding. Poultry guide 16(2): 57-58, 1979

Pressure and shear: the pros and cons of "gentle therapeutic movement", and product testing. Ostomy/Wound Management 41(10): 6; Author Reply 6, 8, 1995

Parenteral nutrition: uses, indications, and compounding. Compendium 29(2): 76-8, 80-5, 2007

Technology in Parenteral Nutrition Compounding. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 33(6): 796-802, 2018

Uptake of antioxidants by natural nutrition and supplementation: pros and cons from the dermatological point of view. Skin Pharmacology and Physiology 24(5): 269-273, 2011

Issues surrounding compounding of parenteral nutrition. Jpen. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 36(2 Suppl.): 36s-37s, 2012

Microbiological risks in parenteral nutrition compounding. Nutrition 13(1): 60-61, 1997

Another tragic parenteral nutrition compounding error. P and T 39(12): 810-822, 2014

Compounding parenteral nutrition: reducing the risks. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 24(4): 441-446, 2009

Safe practices for compounding of parenteral nutrition. Jpen. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 36(2 Suppl.): 14s-19s, 2012

Basic principles for compounding all-in-one parenteral nutrition admixtures. Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care 1(3): 291-296, 1999