+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Compounds enhanced in a mass spectrometric profile of smokers' exhaled breath versus non-smokers as determined in a pilot study using PTR-MS



Compounds enhanced in a mass spectrometric profile of smokers' exhaled breath versus non-smokers as determined in a pilot study using PTR-MS



Journal of Breath Research 2(2): 026002



A pilot study has been carried out to define typical characteristics of the trace gas compounds in exhaled breath of non-smokers and smokers to assist interpretation of breath analysis data from patients who smoke with respiratory diseases and lung cancer. Exhaled breath was analyzed using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) for 370 volunteers (81 smokers, 210 non-smokers, 79 ex-smokers). Volatile organic compounds corresponding to product ions at seven mass-to-charge ratios (m/z 28, 42, 69, 79, 93, 97, 123) in the PTR-MS spectra differentiated between smokers and non-smokers. The Youden index (= maximum of sensitivity + specificity - 1, YI) as a measure for differentiation between smokers and non-smokers was YI = 0.43 for ions at the m/z values 28 (tentatively identified as HCN), YI = 0.75 for m/z = 42 (tentatively identified as acetonitrile) and YI = 0.53 for m/z = 79 (tentatively identified as benzene). No statistically significant difference between smokers and non-smokers was observed for the product ions at m/z = 31 and 33 (compounds tentatively identified as formaldehyde and methanol). When interpreting the exhaled breath of lung cancer or COPD patients, who often smoke, compounds appearing at the above-mentioned seven mass-to-charge ratios should be considered with appropriate care to avoid misdiagnosis. Validation studies in larger numbers of patients with more precise delineation of their smoking behavior and using additional analytical techniques such as GC/MS and SIFT-MS should be carried out.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269403

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21383443

DOI: 10.1088/1752-7155/2/2/026002


Related references

Analysis of exhaled breath from smokers, passive smokers and non-smokers by solid-phase microextraction gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Biomedical Chromatography 23(5): 551-556, 2008

Mass spectrometric profile of exhaled breath--field study by PTR-MS. Respiratory Physiology and Neurobiology 145(2-3): 295-300, 2005

Nicotine in hair of smokers and non-smokers: Sampling procedure and gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis. Pharmacology and Toxicology 75(3-4): 143-149, 1994

A dual center study to compare breath volatile organic compounds from smokers and non-smokers with and without COPD. Journal of Breath Research 10(2): 026006, 2016

Exhaled nitric oxide and exhaled breath condensate pH as predictors of sputum cell counts in optimally treated asthmatic smokers. Respirology 16(5): 811-818, 2011

Differential effects of dietary supplements on metabolomic profile of smokers versus non-smokers. Genome Medicine 4(2): 14, 2012

Impact of supragingival therapy on subgingival microbial profile in smokers versus non-smokers with severe chronic periodontitis. Journal of Oral Microbiology 4, 2012

A rapid method for the chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of tobacco cigarette and electronic cigarette smokers. Journal of Chromatography. a 1410: 51-59, 2015

Protein profile of exhaled breath condensate determined by high resolution mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis 105: 134-149, 2015

Comparison of angiographic profile of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome among smokers versus non smokers: a retrospective observational study. Indian Heart Journal 70: S7-S8, 2018

Sex Effects on Smoking Cue Perception in Non-Smokers, Smokers, and Ex-Smokers: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7: 187, 2016

Comparisons of urinary excretion of three DNA oxidation adducts and isoprostane F 2alpha measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in smokers, ex-smokers and non-smokers. Free Radical Biology & Medicine 33(Suppl. 2): S329, 2002

No difference in hypertension prevalence in smokers, former smokers and non-smokers after adjusting for body mass index and age: a cross-sectional study from the Czech Republic, 2010. Tobacco Induced Diseases 13(1): 24, 2015

Thermal desorption/gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric analysis of volatile organic compounds in the offices of smokers and nonsmokers. Biomedical and Environmental Mass Spectrometry 14(8): 363-367, 1987

Chromatographic analysis of VOC patterns in exhaled breath from smokers and nonsmokers. Biomedical Chromatography 32(4), 2017