+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition

Comprehension as a basis for metacognitive judgments: effects of effort after meaning on recall and metacognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36(2): 552-557

We examined free recall and metacognitive judgments of ambiguous sentences studied with and without clues to facilitate their comprehension. Sentences were either studied without clues, with clues meaningfully embedded, or with clues following a 10-s interval delay. After presentation, subjects made judgments of comprehension (JCOMPs) or judgments of learning (JOLs). Puzzling over the meaning of sentences for several seconds prior to receiving the clue enhanced recall compared with studying sentences without clues or with embedded clues. This benefit of effort after meaning was not reflected in JCOMPs or JOLs. Rather, sentences considered relatively easy to understand received higher JOLs regardless of experimental condition. Although effort after meaning enhanced recall, subjects displayed no awareness of this benefit in their judgments. Our study adds to a growing literature showing students' ignorance of factors affecting their own learning, which have important implications for education. Making learning conditions more difficult, thus requiring students to engage more cognitive effort, often leads to enhanced retention.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269509

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20192550

DOI: 10.1037/a0018277

Related references

The effects of effort toward comprehension on recall. Memory & Cognition 6(1): 20-25, 1978

Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning. Memory & Cognition 36(2): 429-437, 2008

Attributing study effort to data-driven and goal-driven effects: implications for metacognitive judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35(5): 1338-1343, 2009

The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs. Memory & Cognition 37(4): 447-463, 2009

Metacognition: computation, neurobiology and function || The neural basis of metacognitive ability. Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences 367(1594): 1338-1349, 2012

Normative multitrial recall performance, metacognitive judgments, and retrieval latencies for Lithuanian-English paired associates. Behavior Research Methods 42(3): 634-642, 2010

Grasping the meaning of metaphor story recall and comprehension. Child Development 56(5): 1156-1166, 1985

Testing and metacognition: retrieval practise effects on metacognitive monitoring in learning from text. Memory: 1-11, 2018

Influence of text type, topic familiarity, and stuttering frequency on listener recall, comprehension, and mental effort. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52(2): 534-546, 2008

Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology 5(4): 331-346, 1991

Social influences on metacognition: Effects of colearner questioning on comprehension monitoring. Journal of Educational Psychology 88(4): 689-703, 1996

Basis of metamemory judgments for text with multiple-choice, essay and recall tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology 23(2): 204-222, 2009

Effects of two cooperative conditions on peer-group discussions, reading comprehension, and metacognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology 17(2): 175-193, 1992

Comprehension calibration and recall prediction accuracy of texts: Reading skill, reading strategies, and effort. Journal of Educational Psychology 87(4): 545-558, 1995

Effects of Cognitive and Metacognitive Prereading Activities on the Reading Comprehension of ESL Learners. Educational Psychology 12(3-4): 315-331, 1992