+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comprehensive Comparison of the 5-Year Results of All-on-4 Mandibular Implant Systems With Acrylic and Ceramic Suprastructures

Comprehensive Comparison of the 5-Year Results of All-on-4 Mandibular Implant Systems With Acrylic and Ceramic Suprastructures

Journal of Oral Implantology 41(6): 675-683

The objective of the present study was to evaluate the comprehensive 5-year results of fixed mandibular dentures fabricated from metal-acrylic or metal-ceramics according to the All-on-4 protocol. Twenty-seven patients who received immediately loaded All-on-4 fixed mandibular dentures in 2006 were included in the study, and they were evaluated up to 5 years after denture integration. Endpoints were chosen in accordance with the 2007 Pisa consensus and included bone resorption, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), the sulcus fluid flow rate (SFFR), and prosthodontic complications. The initial situation in both groups was largely identical. Bone loss remained under 2 mm after 5 years in all implants and showed no group difference. The SFFR showed a gradual increase in both groups, and acrylic-bearing implants showed a substantially and significantly higher flow rate from the third year onward. The subjective improvement as expressed by the OHIP score was immediate and dramatic, and it showed no group differences. All acrylic restorations showed some extent of abrasion, and veneer fractures occurred in 4 patients (28.6%). Besides a single fracture of a fixation screw, there were no prosthetic complications in patients with ceramic suprastructures. According to bone loss and subjective outcome, acrylic and ceramic suprastructures appeared to be equivalent after 5 years; however, sulcus flow and prosthodontic complications suggest that the economic advantage of acrylic dentures may be specious. The rational choice of implant suprastructures requires comprehensive, long-term observation. Short-term economic benefits might be cancelled out in the long term.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269587

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24712706

DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-14-00016

Related references

Dental implant suprastructures using cobalt-chromium alloy compared with gold alloy framework veneered with ceramic or acrylic resin: a retrospective cohort study up to 18 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23(7): 853-860, 2012

Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: 6-year results of a multicenter clinical trial on 3 different implant systems. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 59(11): 1260-8; Discussion 1269-70, 2001

A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 12(3): 209-218, 2010

Randomized prospective clinical trial of two implant systems for overdenture treatment: a comparison of the 2-year and 5-year results using the clinical implant performance scale. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 27(2): 94-98, 1998

Prostheses in the mandible. The in-vivo measurements of mandibular deformation and the consequences for implant-anchored suprastructures. Schweizer Monatsschrift für Zahnmedizin 109(2): 116-134, 1999

Clinical outcome and peri-implant findings of four-implant-supported distal cantilevered fixed mandibular prostheses: five-year results. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 28(3): 831-840, 2014

Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(3): 330-337, 2011

Comparison of postoperative results after implantation of hydrophilic acrylic or hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens: data of one-year prospective clinical study. Medicina 44(12): 936-943, 2009

Implant survival and prosthetic complications of mandibular metal-acrylic resin implant complete fixed dental prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 111(6): 466-475, 2015

Randomized clinical trial of implant-supported ceramic-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: preliminary results. Journal of Prosthodontics 23(2): 73-82, 2016

Locator® versus ceramic/electroplated double-crown attachments: a prospective study on the intraindividual comparison of implant-supported mandibular prostheses. Clinical Oral Investigations 2018, 2018

Comparison of surgical outcomes and implant wear between ceramic-ceramic and ceramic-polyethylene articulations in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 26(6 Suppl.): 72-77, 2012

Implant-retained maxillary overdentures on milled bar suprastructures: a 10-year follow-up of surgical and prosthetic care and aftercare. International Journal of Prosthodontics 22(2): 181-192, 2009

Comparison of dental implant systems for mandibular overdentures. Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde 105(12): 447-450, 2002

A comparison of two dental implant systems in partially edentulous patients: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Oral Implantology 7(4): 397-409, 2015