+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors and Management of Impending Flap Loss in 2138 Breast Free Flaps

Comprehensive Evaluation of Risk Factors and Management of Impending Flap Loss in 2138 Breast Free Flaps

Annals of Plastic Surgery 77(1): 67-71

Loss of a breast free flap is a relatively rare but catastrophic occurrence. Our study aims to identify risk factors for flap loss and to assess whether different salvage techniques affect flap salvage. We performed a retrospective review of all breast free flaps performed at a single institution from 2000 to 2010. Overall, 2138 flaps were performed in 1608 patients (unilateral, 1120 and bilateral, 488) with 44 flap losses (2.1%). Age, body mass index, smoking, radiation, chemotherapy, and surgeon experience did not affect flap loss. Abdominal flaps based on a single perforator were at significantly higher risk for flap loss compared with flaps based on multiple perforators (P = 0.0007). Subgroup analysis of the subset of 166 compromised free flaps (flaps requiring a return to the operating room, an intraoperative anastomotic revision, or loss/partial loss of a free flap) demonstrated deep inferior epigastric perforator, and other flaps (superficial inferior epigastric artery and superior gluteal artery perforator) were significantly associated with flap loss [odds ratio (OR) 5.20; P = 0.03 and OR 6.91; P = 0.0004, respectively] compared with transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps. Although an intraoperative complication was not associated with a flap loss, the need for a reoperation was strongly predictive (P < 0.0001). Flap salvage was the highest within the first 24 hours (83.7%) and significantly less between days 1 and 3 (38.6%; P < 0.0001) and beyond 4 days (29.4%; P < 0.0001). Longer ischemia time was significantly associated with flap loss (P = 0.04). Salvage techniques (aspirin, heparinzation, thrombectomy, and thrombolytic) had no impact on flap salvage rates. Heparinization and thrombolytics were associated with higher loss rates (OR 3.40; P = 0.003 and OR 10.36; P < 0.0001, respectively). Free flap loss following breast reconstruction is multifactorial with higher losses in superficial inferior epigastric artery and gluteal flaps, single-perforator abdominal flaps, and longer ischemia times. Salvage rates are most successful within the first 24 hours, and the use of heparinization, aspirin, and thrombolytics does not improve salvage rates.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052269597

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25003429

DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000263

Related references

Identification of independent risk factors for flap failure: A retrospective analysis of 1530 free flaps for breast, head and neck and extremity reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 69(7): 894-906, 2016

Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction. Head & Neck 38 Suppl 1: E771-E775, 2018

Risk factors of mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction using low abdominal flaps. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery 50(5): 302-306, 2016

Other flaps for head and neck use: temporoparietal fascial free flap, lateral arm free flap, omental free flap. Facial Plastic Surgery 12(1): 81-89, 1996

Risk factors and complications in free TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Annals of Plastic Surgery 56(5): 492-497, 2006

Buried free flaps in head and neck reconstruction: higher risk of free flap failure?. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2016

Risk factors and blood flow in the free transverse rectus abdominis (TRAM) flap: smoking and high flap weight impair the free TRAM flap microcirculation. Annals of Plastic Surgery 59(4): 364-371, 2007

Reconstruction of oromandibular defects by vascularized free flaps: the radial forearm free flap and fibular free flap as major donor sites. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67(7): 1473-1477, 2009

Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery. Microsurgery 34(8): 589-594, 2015

Free flap monitoring using an implantable anastomotic venous flow coupler: Analysis of 119 consecutive abdominal-based free flaps for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 35(5): 337-344, 2016

Regional intravascular sympathetic blockade for better results in flap surgery: an experimental study of free flaps, island flaps, and pedicle flaps in the rabbit ear. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 66(5): 690-698, 1980

Cystic biliary atresia: A distinct clinical entity that may mimic choledochal cyst. Radiology Case Reports 13(2): 415-418, 2018

Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 121(5): 1519-1526, 2008

Can skin islands of free muscle flaps be used as pedicled perforator flaps years after free flap transfer?. European Journal of Plastic Surgery 35(11): 841-843, 2012

Free latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for secondary breast reconstruction after partial loss of a TRAM flap. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 100(3): 690-694, 1997