+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction



Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction



Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 132(6): 1383-1391



This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of factors that might contribute to abdominal donor-site morbidity after abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. The authors performed a retrospective analysis of all abdominally based free flap breast reconstructions performed from January of 2000 through December of 2010 at their institution. Overall, 89 of 1507 patients developed an abdominal bulge/hernia (unilateral: 57 of 1044; bilateral: 32 of 463). A unilateral transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap was significantly more likely to develop an abdominal bulge/hernia than was a muscle-sparing TRAM flap or a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap (9.9 percent versus 3.7 percent versus 5.9 percent; p = 0.004). However, there was no difference in the risk of developing an abdominal bulge/hernia between a muscle-sparing TRAM and a DIEP flap (p = 0.36). Patients who underwent bilateral reconstructions were 1.35 times more likely to develop an abdominal bulge/hernia than patients who underwent unilateral reconstruction, but the difference was not significant. Harvesting more fascia as occurs when both medial and lateral rows are used was significantly associated with need for mesh (p < 0.0001). Overall, placement of mesh for fascia closure reduced the odds of occurrence of bulge/hernia by 70 percent compared with primary fascia closure. There was no significant difference in the risk of developing abdominal bulge/hernia between bilateral versus unilateral breast reconstruction. For abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction, the extent of the fascia harvested, how it is repaired, and the amount of muscle preserved might play an important role in donor-site morbidity. Therapeutic, III.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 052269761

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24005365


Related references

Reply: comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 135(1): 227e, 2015

Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 135(1): 226e-227e, 2015

Predicting and managing donor-site wound complications in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction: improved outcomes with early reoperative closure. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 135(1): 14-23, 2015

Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 121(5): 1519-1526, 2008

Comprehensive Analysis of Donor-Site Morbidity following Free Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap Harvest. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 138(4): 899-909, 2017

Abdominally based free flap planning in breast reconstruction with computed tomographic angiography: systematic review and meta-analysis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 133(3): 483-494, 2014

Comparison of outcomes and donor-site morbidity in unilateral free TRAM versus DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 60(11): 1219-1224, 2007

Desmoid tumor following abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction. Gland Surgery 6(1): 89-92, 2017

Free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a systematic review of flap complication rates and donor-site morbidity. Annals of Plastic Surgery 62(5): 560-563, 2009

Comparison of donor-site complications and functional outcomes in free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 117(3): 737-46; Discussion 747-50, 2006

Optimization of breast reconstruction results using TMG flap in 30 cases: Evaluation of several refinements addressing flap design, shaping techniques, and reduction of donor site morbidity. Microsurgery 2018, 2018

Comparison of the subjective satisfaction of the donor site morbidity: Free radial forearm flap versus anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction in tongue cancer patients. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral Y Cirugia Bucal 24(2): E236-E242, 2019

Donor-Site Morbidity after Partial Second Toe Pulp Free Flap for Fingertip Reconstruction. Archives of Plastic Surgery 43(1): 66-70, 2016

Donor site morbidity of free jejunal flap reconstruction of the oropharyngeal cavity. European Journal of Plastic Surgery 22(8): 376-378, 1999

Donor site morbidity following DIEP flap for breast reconstruction in Asian patients: Is it different?. Microsurgery 35(8): 596-602, 2016