+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part I: a knowledge mapping approach for defining most critical risk factors in integrative risk management of chemicals and nanomaterials



Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part I: a knowledge mapping approach for defining most critical risk factors in integrative risk management of chemicals and nanomaterials



Science of the Total Environment 408(18): 3852-3859



This paper helps bridge the gap between scientists and other stakeholders in the areas of human and environmental risk management of chemicals and engineered nanomaterials. This connection is needed due to the evolution of stakeholder awareness and scientific progress related to human and environmental health which involves complex methodological demands on risk management. At the same time, the available scientific knowledge is also becoming more scattered across multiple scientific disciplines. Hence, the understanding of potentially risky situations is increasingly multifaceted, which again challenges risk assessors in terms of giving the 'right' relative priority to the multitude of contributing risk factors. A critical issue is therefore to develop procedures that can identify and evaluate worst case risk conditions which may be input to risk level predictions. Therefore, this paper suggests a conceptual modelling procedure that is able to define appropriate worst case conditions in complex risk management. The result of the analysis is an assembly of system models, denoted the Worst Case Definition (WCD) model, to set up and evaluate the conditions of multi-dimensional risk identification and risk quantification. The model can help optimize risk assessment planning by initial screening level analyses and guiding quantitative assessment in relation to knowledge needs for better decision support concerning environmental and human health protection or risk reduction. The WCD model facilitates the evaluation of fundamental uncertainty using knowledge mapping principles and techniques in a way that can improve a complete uncertainty analysis. Ultimately, the WCD is applicable for describing risk contributing factors in relation to many different types of risk management problems since it transparently and effectively handles assumptions and definitions and allows the integration of different forms of knowledge, thereby supporting the inclusion of multifaceted risk components in cumulative risk management.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052302844

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19945144

DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.010


Related references

Conscious worst case definition for risk assessment, part II: a methodological case study for pesticide risk assessment. Science of the Total Environment 408(18): 3860-3870, 2010

An integrative risk assessment approach for persistent chemicals: a case study on dioxins, furans and dioxin-like PCBs in France. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 70(1): 261-269, 2014

Conceptual modeling for identification of worst case conditions in environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials using nZVI and C6 as case studies. 2011

Conceptual modeling for identification of worst case conditions in environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials using nZVI and C60 as case studies. Science of the Total Environment 409(19): 4109-4124, 2011

Environmental risks of chemicals and genetically modified organisms: a comparison. Part II: Sustainability and precaution in risk assessment and risk management. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 8(3): 222-226, 2001

Risk assessment and risk management of nanomaterials in the workplace: translating research to practice. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 56(5): 491-505, 2012

Global risk assessments, issues, concepts & applications in business environment risk assessment, country, investment & trade risk analysis, political risk assessment & management. 1983

The EU existing chemicals regulation: A suitable tool for environmental risk assessment and risk management?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 6(3): 127-129, 1999

Risk assessment and risk management of industrial and environmental chemicals. 1988

Is the risk from nanomaterials perceived as different from the risk of 'chemicals' by the Australian public?. Public Health Research and Practice 26(2):, 2016

Probabilistic approach for the risk assessment of nanomaterials: A case study for graphene nanoplatelets. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 222(1): 76-83, 2019

Chemicals in California drinking water Source contaminants, risk assessment, risk management, and regulatory standards. Journal of Hazardous Materials 39(2): 173-192, 1994

Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Chemicals in China. Huan Jing Ke Xue= Huanjing Kexue 37(2): 404-412, 2016

Critical factors in genetic risk assessment of human exposure to environmental chemicals. Birth Defects Original Article Series 24(5): 13-24, 1988

Cardiovascular risk factors among college students: Knowledge, perception, and risk assessment. Journal of American College Health 65(3): 158-167, 2016