EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Construct measurement quality improves predictive accuracy in violence risk assessment: an illustration using the personality assessment inventory



Construct measurement quality improves predictive accuracy in violence risk assessment: an illustration using the personality assessment inventory



Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31(4): 477-493



Much of the risk assessment literature has focused on the predictive validity of risk assessment tools. However, these tools often comprise a list of risk factors that are themselves complex constructs, and focusing on the quality of measurement of individual risk factors may improve the predictive validity of the tools. The present study illustrates this concern using the Antisocial Features and Aggression scales of the Personality Assessment Inventory (Morey, 1991). In a sample of 1,545 prison inmates and offenders undergoing treatment for substance abuse (85% male), we evaluated (a) the factorial validity of the ANT and AGG scales, (b) the utility of original ANT and AGG scales and newly derived ANT and AGG scales for predicting antisocial outcomes (recidivism and institutional infractions), and (c) whether items with a stronger relationship to the underlying constructs (higher factor loadings) were in turn more strongly related to antisocial outcomes. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) indicated that ANT and AGG items were not structured optimally in these data in terms of correspondence to the subscale structure identified in the PAI manual. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted on a random split-half of the sample to derive optimized alternative factor structures, and cross-validated in the second split-half using CFA. Four-factor models emerged for both the ANT and AGG scales, and, as predicted, the size of item factor loadings was associated with the strength with which items were associated with institutional infractions and community recidivism. This suggests that the quality by which a construct is measured is associated with its predictive strength. Implications for risk assessment are discussed.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052310559

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23703930

DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2066



Related references

Testing the predictive validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in relation to inmate misconduct and violence. Psychological Assessment 28(8): 871-884, 2015

Violence by psychiatric patients: the impact of archival measurement source on violence base rates and risk assessment accuracy. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie 48(11): 734-740, 2004

Violence risk assessment and women: predictive accuracy of the HCR-20 in a civil psychiatric sample. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 29(5): 623-633, 2012

Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: a second-order systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 31(1): 55-73, 2013

A pilot study of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in corrections: assessment of malingering, suicide risk, and aggression in male inmates. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 15(4): 469-482, 1998

Gender differences in risk factors for violence: an examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. Aggressive Behavior 36(6): 390-404, 2011

Assessment of borderline personality features in population samples: is the Personality Assessment Inventory-Borderline Features scale measurement invariant across sex and age?. Psychological Assessment 21(1): 125-130, 2009

Validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory Aggression scales and Violence Potential index in veterans with PTSD. Journal of Personality Assessment 88(1): 90-98, 2007

Personality Assessment Inventory scores as predictors of misconduct, recidivism, and violence: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment 27(2): 534-544, 2014

Family violence risk assessment: A predictive cross-validation study of the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument-Revised (DVSI-R). Law and Human Behavior 36(2): 120-129, 2012

Exploring the Assessment of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders With the Personality Assessment Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment (): 1-8, 2016

The Suicide SPI and Violence Potential Indices VPI from the Personality Assessment Inventory A Preliminary Exploration of Validity in an Outpatient Psychiatric Sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 34(3): 423-431, 2012

Predictive validity of the personality assessment inventory (PAI) for identifying criminal reoffending following completion of an in-jail addiction treatment program. Psychological Assessment 26(2): 673-678, 2015

Predictive value of the Personality Assessment Inventory for nonepileptic seizures versus alcohol patch induction, using closed-circuit video-EEG. Epilepsia 43(Supplement 7): 158-159, 2002

Personality assessment of the early visually impaired utilizing the california psychological inventory and the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 5(1): 66-69, 1982