+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cost savings of universal decolonization to prevent intensive care unit infection: implications of the REDUCE MRSA trial

Cost savings of universal decolonization to prevent intensive care unit infection: implications of the REDUCE MRSA trial

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 35(Suppl. 3): S23-S31

To estimate and compare the impact on healthcare costs of 3 alternative strategies for reducing bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit (ICU): methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screening and isolation, targeted decolonization (ie, screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers or infections), and universal decolonization (ie, no screening and decolonization of all ICU patients). Cost analysis using decision modeling. We developed a decision-analysis model to estimate the health care costs of targeted decolonization and universal decolonization strategies compared with a strategy of MRSA nares screening and isolation. Effectiveness estimates were derived from a recent randomized trial of the 3 strategies, and cost estimates were derived from the literature. In the base case, universal decolonization was the dominant strategy and was estimated to have both lower intervention costs and lower total ICU costs than either screening and isolation or targeted decolonization. Compared with screening and isolation, universal decolonization was estimated to save $171,000 and prevent 9 additional bloodstream infections for every 1,000 ICU admissions. The dominance of universal decolonization persisted under a wide range of cost and effectiveness assumptions. A strategy of universal decolonization for patients admitted to the ICU would both reduce bloodstream infections and likely reduce healthcare costs compared with strategies of MRSA nares screening and isolation or screening and isolation coupled with targeted decolonization.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052368869

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25222894

DOI: 10.1086/677819

Related references

Universal decolonization to prevent intensive care unit meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Journal of Hospital Infection 88(3): 179-180, 2015

Impact of active screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and decolonization on MRSA infections, mortality and medical cost: a quasi-experimental study in surgical intensive care unit. Critical Care 19: 143, 2016

Preventing infection in the intensive care unit: targeted or universal decolonization. National Medical Journal of India 26(3): 161-163, 2014

Efficacy of infection control interventions, other than decolonization, in reducing the incidence of new MRSA acquisition in a neurosurgical intensive care unit. Infectious Diseases 50(9): 714-717, 2018

The Effect of Universal Decolonization With Screening in Critical Care to Reduce MRSA Across an Entire Hospital. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 38(4): 430-435, 2017

Patterns of Cost for Patients Dying in the Intensive Care Unit and Implications for Cost Savings of Palliative Care Interventions. Journal of Palliative Medicine 19(11): 1171-1178, 2018

Successful control of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a burn intensive care unit by addition of universal decolonization with intranasal mupirocin to basic infection prevention measures. American Journal of Infection Control 2019, 2019

Universal decolonization with hypochlorous solution in a burn intensive care unit in a tertiary care community hospital. American Journal of Infection Control 44(9): 1044-1046, 2017

Beyond the Intensive Care Unit (ICU): Countywide Impact of Universal ICU Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization. American Journal of Epidemiology 183(5): 480-489, 2016

Bloodstream Infection in the Intensive Care Unit: Preventable Adverse Events and Cost Savings. Value in Health Regional Issues 1(2): 136-141, 2012

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquisition risk in an endemic neonatal intensive care unit with an active surveillance culture and decolonization programme. Journal of Hospital Infection 95(1): 91-97, 2016

Cost savings from reduced catheter-related bloodstream infection after simulation-based education for residents in a medical intensive care unit. Simulation in Healthcare 5(2): 98-102, 2010

Active Surveillance Cultures and Decolonization to Reduce Staphylococcus aureus Infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 37(4): 381-387, 2017

Risk factors for intensive care unit acquired nasal colonization of MRSA and its impact on MRSA infection. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 27(5): 412-417, 2014

Control of MRSA infection and colonisation in an intensive care unit by GeneOhm MRSA assay and culture methods. Bmc Infectious Diseases 9: 137, 2009