+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

DEFI 2005: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of automated external defibrillator cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol on outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest



DEFI 2005: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of automated external defibrillator cardiopulmonary resuscitation protocol on outcome from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest



Circulation 121(14): 1614-1622



Using automated external defibrillators (AEDs) that implement the Guidelines 2000 resuscitation protocol constrains administration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to <50% of AED connection time. We tested a different AED protocol aimed at increasing the CPR administered to patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. In a randomized controlled trial, patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest requiring defibrillation were treated with 1 of 2 AED protocols. In the control protocol, based on Guidelines 2000, sequences of up to 3 stacked countershocks were delivered, with rhythm analyses initially and after the first and second shocks. The study protocol featured 1 minute of CPR before the first shock, shorter CPR interruptions before and after each shock, and no stacked shocks. The primary end point was survival to hospital admission. Of 5107 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients connected to an AED, 1238 required defibrillation, and 845 were included in the final analysis. Study patients (n=421) had shorter preshock pauses (9 versus 19 seconds; P<0.001), had shorter postshock pauses (11 versus 33 seconds; P<0.001), and received more CPR (61% versus 48%; P<0.001) and fewer shocks (2.5 versus 2.9; P<0.001) than control patients (n=424). Similar proportions survived to hospital admission (43.2% versus 42.7%; P=0.87), survived to hospital discharge (13.3% versus 10.6%; P=0.19), achieved return of spontaneous circulation before physician arrival (47.0% versus 48.6%; P=0.65), and survived to 1 year (P=0.77). Following prompts from AEDs programmed with a protocol similar to Guidelines 2005, firefighters shortened pauses in CPR and improved overall hands-on time, but survival to hospital admission of patients with ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00139542.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052436731

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20351239

DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.878389


Related references

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone vs. cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus automated external defibrillator use by non-healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis on 1583 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 76(2): 226-232, 2008

Does bystander-initiated chest compressions-only result in better patient outcome than full cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? Unexpected result from a post-hoc analysis of the DEFI 2005 Trial. Resuscitation 82(1): 130-131, 2011

Interruption of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the use of the automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Annals of Emergency Medicine 42(4): 449-457, 2003

Use of automated external defibrillator in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled trial. Acc Current Journal Review 13(5): 66-0, 2004

Use of automated external defibrillator by first responders in out of hospital cardiac arrest: prospective controlled trial. Bmj 327(7427): 1312, 2003

Community-based automated external defibrillator only resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients. American Heart Journal 172: 192-200, 2016

International multicentre trial protocol to assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Thrombolysis in Cardiac Arrest (TROICA) Study. European Journal of Clinical Investigation 35(5): 315-323, 2005

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurring in southern Ontario health care clinics: bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillator use. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien 56(6): E213, 2010

Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of Automated External Defibrillators by laypersons in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using an SMS alert service. Resuscitation 82(10): 1273-1278, 2011

Effect of Bag-Mask Ventilation vs Endotracheal Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiorespiratory Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319(8): 779-787, 2018

Automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a load-distributing band external cardiac support device for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a single centre experience of AutoPulse-CPR. International Journal of Cardiology 180: 7-14, 2015

Real-time feedback, debriefing, and retraining system of cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: a study protocol for a cluster parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Trials 19(1): 510, 2018

Adenosine during cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation a placebo controlled randomized trial. Critical Care Medicine 20(5): 645-649, 1992

The impact of an automated external defibrillator grant program on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcome Dollars save lives. Circulation 100(18 Suppl. ): I 91, 1999

Refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation at hospital arrival - survival and neurological outcome without extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Critical Care 22(1): 242, 2018