+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Detecting functional connectivity change points for single-subject fMRI data



Detecting functional connectivity change points for single-subject fMRI data



Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience 7: 143



Recently in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies there has been an increased interest in understanding the dynamic manner in which brain regions communicate with one another, as subjects perform a set of experimental tasks or as their psychological state changes. Dynamic Connectivity Regression (DCR) is a data-driven technique used for detecting temporal change points in functional connectivity between brain regions where the number and location of the change points are unknown a priori. After finding the change points, DCR estimates a graph or set of relationships between the brain regions for data that falls between pairs of change points. In previous work, the method was predominantly validated using multi-subject data. In this paper, we concentrate on single-subject data and introduce a new DCR algorithm. The new algorithm increases accuracy for individual subject data with a small number of observations and reduces the number of false positives in the estimated undirected graphs. We also introduce a new Likelihood Ratio test for comparing sparse graphs across (or within) subjects; thus allowing us to determine whether data should be combined across subjects. We perform an extensive simulation analysis on vector autoregression (VAR) data as well as to an fMRI data set from a study (n = 23) of a state anxiety induction using a socially evaluative threat challenge. The focus on single-subject data allows us to study the variation between individuals and may provide us with a deeper knowledge of the workings of the brain.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052513856

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24198781

DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00143


Related references

Dynamic connectivity detection: an algorithm for determining functional connectivity change points in fMRI data. Frontiers in Neuroscience 9: 285, 2015

Quantifying functional connectivity in multi-subject fMRI data using component models. Human Brain Mapping 38(2): 882-899, 2016

The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations. Neuroimage 135: 1-15, 2018

An independent components and functional connectivity analysis of resting state fMRI data points to neural network dysregulation in adult ADHD. Human Brain Mapping 35(4): 1261-1272, 2014

fMRI-Based Inter-Subject Cortical Alignment Using Functional Connectivity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22: 378-386, 2009

Detecting functional connectivity in fMRI using PCA and regression analysis. Brain Topography 22(2): 134-144, 2009

Detecting low-frequency functional connectivity in fMRI using a self-organizing map (SOM) algorithm. Human Brain Mapping 20(4): 220-226, 2003

The impact of temporal compression and space selection on SVM analysis of single-subject and multi-subject fMRI data. Neuroimage 33(4): 1055-1065, 2006

Impact of sampling rate on statistical significance for single subject fMRI connectivity analysis. Human Brain Mapping 2019, 2019

A comparison of statistical methods for detecting context-modulated functional connectivity in fMRI. Neuroimage 84: 1042-1052, 2014

Extracting orthogonal subject- and condition-specific signatures from fMRI data using whole-brain effective connectivity. Neuroimage 178: 238-254, 2018

Reproducibility of single-subject functional connectivity measurements. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 32(3): 548-555, 2011

Automatic sleep staging using fMRI functional connectivity data. Neuroimage 63(1): 63-72, 2013

Diagnosis of single-subject and group fMRI data with SPMd. Human Brain Mapping 27(5): 442-451, 2006

Functional connectivity analysis of fMRI data using parameterized regions-of-interest. Neuroimage 54(1): 410-416, 2011