+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging



Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging



Investigative Radiology 49(10): 675-684



Recent technical developments have facilitated the application of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for interventional and intraoperative imaging. The aim of this study was to compare the radiation doses and image quality in CBCT with those of conventional multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) for abdominal and genitourinary imaging. Different CBCT and MSCT protocols for imaging soft tissues and hard-contrast objects at different dose levels were investigated in this study. Local skin and organ doses were measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters placed in an anthropomorphic phantom. Moreover, the contrast-to-noise ratio, the noise-power spectrum, and the high-contrast resolution derived from the modulation transfer function were determined in a phantom with the same absorption properties as those of anthropomorphic phantom. The effective dose of the examined abdominal/genitourinary CBCT protocols ranged between 0.35 mSv and 18.1 mSv. As compared with MSCT, the local skin dose of CBCT examinations could locally reach much higher doses up to 190 mGy. The effective dose necessary to realize the same contrast-to-noise ratio with CBCT and MSCT depended on the MSCT convolution kernel: the MSCT dose was smaller than the corresponding CBCT dose for a soft kernel but higher than that for a hard kernel. The noise-power spectrum of the CBCT images at tube voltages of 85/90 kV(p) is at least half of that of images measured at 103/115 kV(p) at any arbitrarily chosen spatial frequency. Although the pixel size and slice thickness of CBCT were half of those of the MSCT images, high-contrast resolution was inferior to the MSCT images reconstructed with a hard convolution kernel. As compared with MSCT using a medium-hard convolution kernel, CBCT produces images at medium noise levels and, simultaneously, medium spatial resolution at approximately the same dose. It is well suited for visualizing hard-contrast objects in the abdomen with relatively low image noise and patient dose. For the detection of low-contrast objects at standard tube voltages of approximately 120 kV(p), however, MSCT should be preferred.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052703353

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24853071

DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000069


Related references

Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52(1): 76-80, 2014

A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging. European Radiology 25(7): 1891-1900, 2016

Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 75(5): 384-398, 2015

Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 38(6): 367-378, 2009

Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics 107(4): 559-565, 2009

Superiority of synchrony of 256-slice cone beam computed tomography for acquiring pulsating objects. Comparison with conventional multislice computed tomography. International Journal of Cardiology 118(3): 400-405, 2006

Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation. Clinical Oral Investigations 18(1): 301-311, 2015

Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: a comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. Acta Radiologica 48(2): 207-212, 2007

Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Skeletal Radiology 39(11): 1087-1095, 2011

Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography. Foot and Ankle Surgery 2019, 2019

Image Quality of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography and Electron-beam Computed Tomography. Investigative Radiology 39(6): 357-364, 2004

Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning. Clinical Oral Investigations 17(1): 317-324, 2014

Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Investigative Radiology 39(6): 357-364, 2004

Patient dose and image quality from mega-voltage cone beam computed tomography imaging. Medical Physics 34(2): 499-506, 2007

Reliability and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography versus conventional multidetector computed tomography for image-guided craniofacial implant planning: An in vitro study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 2019, 2019