+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Dosimetric comparison of doses to organs at risk using 3-D conformal radiotherapy versus intensity modulated radiotherapy in postoperative radiotherapy of periampullary cancers: implications for radiation dose escalation

Dosimetric comparison of doses to organs at risk using 3-D conformal radiotherapy versus intensity modulated radiotherapy in postoperative radiotherapy of periampullary cancers: implications for radiation dose escalation

Jop 14(1): 39-43

Postoperative periampullary cancers with high risk features are managed with adjuvant chemo radiotherapy. Doses of 40-50 Gy have generally been used in conventional radiotherapy. Dose escalation with conventional radiotherapy has been restricted due to surrounding critical organs. The objective of this dosimetric analysis was to evaluate the dose of radiation received by organs at risk using 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten postoperative patients of periampullary cancers were selected for this dosimetric analysis. Planning CT scans films were taken with slice thickness of 2.5 mm and transferred to Eclipse treatment planning system. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the postoperative tumor bed and draining lymph nodal areas. A 1 cm margin was taken around the CTV to generate the planning target volume (PTV). Critical structures contoured for evaluation included bowel bag, bilateral kidneys, liver, stomach and spinal cord. IMRT plans were generated using seven field coplanar beams and 3DCRT planning was done using one anterior and two lateral fields. A dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the PTV. V45 for bowel bag was 212.3 ± 159.0 cc (mean volume ± standard deviation) versus 80.9 ± 57.4 cc in 3DCRT versus IMRT (P=0.033). The V28 dose analysis for bilateral kidneys showed a value of 32.7±23.5 cc (mean volume ± standard deviation) versus 7.9 ± 7.4 cc for 3DCRT versus IMRT, respectively (P=0.013). The D60 for liver using 3DCRT and IMRT was 28.4 ± 8.6 Gy (mean dose ± standard deviation) and 19.9 ± 3.2 Gy, respectively (P=0.020). Doses to bowel bag, liver and kidneys was significantly reduced using IMRT leaving ample scope for dose escalation.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 052705234

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23306333

Related references

Breast-conserving radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost; field-in-field three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy - A dosimetric comparison: Do we need intensity-modulated radiotherapy?. South Asian Journal of Cancer 7(3): 163-166, 2018

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, static intensity-modulated and helical intensity-modulated radiotherapy in glioblastoma. Dosimetric comparison in patients with overlap between target volumes and organs at risk. Tumori 100(3): 272-277, 2014

Poster Dosimetric Comparison of Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy With Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy & Bone Marrow Sparing Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Preoperative Radiation of Locally Advanced Carcinoma Rectum. European Journal of Cancer 47: S407-S408, 2011

Dosimetric comparison of postoperative whole pelvic radiotherapy for endometrial cancer using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy. Acta Oncologica 49(2): 230-236, 2010

Dosimetric Comparison of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques (IMRT) with Radiotherapy Dose Simulations for Left-Sided Mastectomy Patients. European Journal of Breast Health 15(2): 85-89, 2019

Comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy and dynamic three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with regard to dose distribution and sparing of organs at risk. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 51(5): 349-355, 2011

Clinical and dosimetric study of radiotherapy for glioblastoma: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 137(2): 429-438, 2018

Volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy for pancreatic malignancies: dosimetric comparison with sliding-window intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry 39(3): 256-260, 2015

Adjuvant radiotherapy for gallbladder cancer: a dosimetric comparison of conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. World Journal of Gastroenterology 17(3): 397-402, 2011

Dosimetric comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, and helical tomotherapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Journal of Medical Physics 40(4): 190-197, 2016

Adjuvant radiotherapy for gastric cancer: A dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, tomotherapy and conventional intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment plans. Medical Dosimetry 35(2): 115-121, 2010

Superiority of helical tomotherapy on liver sparing and dose escalation in hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison study of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Oncotargets and Therapy 9: 3807-3813, 2016

3D-Conformal versus intensity-modulated postoperative radiotherapy of vaginal vault: A dosimetric comparison. Medical Dosimetry 35(2): 135-142, 2010

Small bowel toxicity in pelvic radiotherapy for postoperative gynecological cancer: comparison between conformal radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 9(3): 280-284, 2014

Dosimetric and efficiency comparison of high-dose radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: volumetric modulated arc therapy versus fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Diseases of the Esophagus 27(6): 585-590, 2015