+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study



Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study



Journal of Hospital Infection 72(3): 227-233



Antimicrobial- and antiseptic-impregnated catheters are strategies recommended to prevent central venous catheter (CVC) colonisation. Few data regarding chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated catheters in intensive care unit (ICU) patients have been reported. We performed a prospective, randomised study comparing the colonisation rates of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated CVCs (group 1) against standard CVCs (group 2). In order to assess catheter colonisation rates, a 4cm segment from the tips of aseptically removed catheters was cultured by the roll-plate method. In all, 109 patients were enrolled with successful catheter insertion, 51 of them in group 1 and 58 in group 2. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regards to age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, ICU admission diagnosis, infection risk, catheter insertion sites or catheter length of stay. The colonisation rates were 29.4% (15 catheters) for group 1 and 34.5% (20 catheters) for group 2 (P=0.50). Double-lumen CVCs impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine were not effective in reducing the incidence of catheter colonisation in ICU patients.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052708144

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19443078

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.018


Related references

Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial. Surgical Infections 8(4): 445-454, 2007

Effectiveness of Minocycline and Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a High-Volume Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Before and after Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(3): 739-747, 2015

Comparison of triple-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with silver nanoparticles (AgTive®) vs conventional catheters in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Hospital Infection 82(2): 101-107, 2012

Chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine coated central venous catheters in haematological patients--a double-blind, randomised, prospective, controlled trial. Supportive Care in Cancer 13(12): 993, 2005

Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(10): 2640-2641, 1996

Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteremia. Archives of Internal Medicine 158(1): 81-87, 1998

Reduction of catheter-related infections in neutropenic patients: a prospective controlled randomized trial using a chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheter. Annals of Hematology 84(4): 258-262, 2005

Reduction of central venous catheter-related infection in cancer patients with severe neutropenia A prospective controlled randomized trial using a chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous line. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 41: 447, 2001

Effectiveness of Minocycline/Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine/Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(4): 891-892, 2015

Anaphylactic shock associated with a central venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 47(5): 556-561, 1998

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine- or rifampicin-miconazole-impregnated venous catheters decrease the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection similarly. American Journal of Infection Control 44(1): 50-53, 2016

Inhibitory effect of explanted chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters on Staphylococcus epidermidis. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 40: 422, 2000

Effect of a second-generation venous catheter impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine on central catheter-related infections: a randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 143(8): 570-580, 2005

Chlorhexidine impregnated central venous catheter inducing an anaphylatic shock in the intensive care unit. Heart Lung and Circulation 20(10): 669-670, 2011

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters: in vitro antibacterial activity and impact on bacterial adhesion. New Microbiologica 35(2): 175-182, 2012