+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial



EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial



Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 69(2): 244-252



Factors affecting diagnostic accuracy and comparison of patients in the follow-up period for negative outcomes are not thoroughly investigated in a randomized trial. Our purpose was to compare diagnostic accuracy, complications, and number of interventions. Prospective, unicentric, single-blind, randomized study. Single tertiary referral university hospital. One hundred twenty patients with intermediate risk for common bile duct (CBD) stones were randomized to either an EUS-first, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC)-second (n = 60) versus an ERC-only (n = 60) procedure. EUS, ERC, sphincterotomy, and balloon sweeping of CBD when needed. Sensitivity of EUS versus ERC, factors affecting diagnostic capability, complications, total number of endoscopic procedures. The sensitivity and specificity of ERC were 75% (95% CI, 42%-93%) and 100% (95% CI, 95%-100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of EUS were 91% (95% CI, 59%-99%) and 100% (95% CI, 95%-100%), respectively. EUS is more sensitive than ERC in detecting stones smaller than 4 mm (90% vs 23%, P < .01). Although not significant, there was a trend for an increased number of endoscopic procedures in the ERC group compared with the EUS group (98 vs 83). The post-ERC pancreatitis rate was 6 in 120 (5%) in all study patients, and the post-ERC pancreatitis rate in patients with an undilated CBD was 5 of 53 (9.43%). The independent factors for post-ERC pancreatitis are undilated CBD (risk ratio [RR] 6.320; 95% CI, 1.703-11.524, P = .009), allocation into the ERC group (RR 2.107; 95% CI, 1.330-3.339, P = .02), female sex (RR 1.803; 95% CI, 1.155-2.813, P = .03), and age less than 40 years (RR 1.888; 95% CI, 1.245-2.863, P = .01). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed higher rate of negative outcome in the ERC group than in the EUS group (P = .049, log-rank test). The EUS-first approach is not associated with further risk for subsequent endoscopic procedures. Patients with an undilated CBD should be investigated by the EUS-first approach to prevent post-ERC pancreatitis.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052752629

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19019364

DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.05.023


Related references

Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies. Endoscopy 39(4): 296-303, 2007

A randomized trial of percutaneous transheptic cholangiography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for bile duct visualization in cholestasis. Gut 16(10): 831, 1975

A randomized trial of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba needle versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for bile duct visualization in jaundice. Gastroenterology 71(3): 439-443, 1976

Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones. Lancet (North American Edition) 351(9097): 159-161, 1998

Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones: erosion of the gold standard?. Gastroenterology 111(3): 829-830, 1996

Early Versus Late Cholecystectomy After Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stones by Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Prospective Randomized Study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 26(3): 202-207, 2016

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015(2): Cd010339, 2015

Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Digestive Surgery 28(5-6): 424-431, 2011

Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration After Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Patients with Concomitant Gall Stones and Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Study. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 26(12): 985-991, 2016

Wait-and-see policy versus cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones in high-risk patients with co-existing gallbladder stones: a prospective randomised trial. Arab Journal of Gastroenterology 15(1): 24-26, 2014

Indication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography by noninvasive predictive factors of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective clinical study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 21(1): 28-32, 2011

Asymptomatic bile duct stones: selection criteria for intravenous cholangiography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 12(11): 1175-1180, 2000

Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration. Surgical Endoscopy 15(1): 4, 2001

Diagnosis of common bile duct stones by intravenous cholangiography: prediction by ultrasound and liver function tests compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 44(2): 158-163, 1996

Comparison of ultrasound scan and liver function tests with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 106(4 Suppl. ): A361, 1994