+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Electronic Health Record Adoption - Maybe It's not about the Money: Physician Super-Users, Electronic Health Records and Patient Care

Electronic Health Record Adoption - Maybe It's not about the Money: Physician Super-Users, Electronic Health Records and Patient Care

Applied Clinical Informatics 2(4): 460-471

The slow adoption of electronic health record (EHR) systems has been linked to physician resistance to change and the expense of EHR adoption. This qualitative study was conducted to evaluate benefits, and clarify limitations of two mature, robust, comprehensive EHR Systems by tech-savvy physicians where resistance and expense are not at issue. Two EHR systems were examined - the paperless VistA / Computerized Patient Record System used at the Veterans' Administration, and the General Electric Centricity Enterprise system used at an academic medical center. A series of interviews was conducted with 20 EHR-savvy multiinstitutional internal medicine (IM) faculty and house staff. Grounded theory was used to analyze the transcribed data and build themes. The relevance and importance of themes were constructed by examining their frequency, convergence, and intensity. Despite eliminating resistance to both adoption and technology as drivers of acceptance, these two robust EHR's are still viewed as having an adverse impact on two aspects of patient care, physician workflow and team communication. Both EHR's had perceived strengths but also significant limitations and neither were able to satisfactorily address all of the physicians' needs. Difficulties related to physician acceptance reflect real concerns about EHR impact on patient care. Physicians are optimistic about the future benefits of EHR systems, but are frustrated with the non-intuitive interfaces and cumbersome data searches of existing EHRs.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052926896

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23616888

DOI: 10.4338/aci-2011-05-ra-0033

Related references

Electronic health record "super-users" and "under-users" in ambulatory care practices. American Journal of Managed Care 24(1): 26-31, 2018

Electronic Health Record Patient Portal Adoption by Health Care Consumers: An Acceptance Model and Survey. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(3): E49, 2016

Adoption of Certified Electronic Health Record Systems and Electronic Information Sharing in Physician Offices: United States, 2013 and 2014. Nchs Data Brief 2016(236): 1-8, 2016

Ensuring Continuity of Care Through Electronic Health Records: Recommendations From the ASCO Electronic Health Record Roundtable. Journal of Oncology Practice 3(3): 137-142, 2007

Extended use of electronic health records by primary care physicians: Does the electronic health record artefact matter?. Health Informatics Journal 2017: 1460458217704244, 2017

Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: evaluation of the electronic health record for supporting patient care and secondary analysis. Bmj 328(7444): 875-878, 2004

Understanding adoption of a personal health record in rural health care clinics: revealing barriers and facilitators of adoption including attributions about potential patient portal users and self-reported characteristics of early adopting users. AMIA .. Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2013: 152-161, 2013

A comparison of physician pre-adoption and adoption views on electronic health records in Canadian medical practices. Journal of Medical Internet Research 13(3): E57, 2011

Electronic Health Record-Related Safety Concerns: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Electronic Health Record Users. Jmir Medical Informatics 4(2): E13, 2016

The relationship between physician practice characteristics and physician adoption of electronic health records. Health Care Management Review 35(1): 55-64, 2011

Electronic health record physician adoption strategies. Physician Executive 36(6): 54-56, 2011

Electronic patient records: moving from islands and bridges towards electronic health records for continuity of care. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2007: 34-46, 2007

The effect of hospital electronic health record adoption on nurse-assessed quality of care and patient safety. Journal of Nursing Administration 41(11): 466-472, 2011

Physician incentives for adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records. Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association 103(9): 420-422, 2010

Physician specialty and variations in adoption of electronic health records. Applied Clinical Informatics 4(2): 225-240, 2013