+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children



Endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children



Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 59(1): 54-56



The present study examined the safety and efficacy of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), compared with an endotracheal tube (ETT), for children undergoing elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). A total of 84 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patients, status I to III, were randomly assigned to receive an ETT or LMA. All participants were premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (up to 15 mg). Airway device placement occurred after induction with 8% sevoflurane and 100% oxygen, placement of an intravenous catheter, and intravenous lidocaine 2 mg/kg up to 100 mg. The following data were collected: time from induction of anesthesia to placement of the airway device, time from end of procedure to arrival in the postoperative acute care unit (PACU), time in the PACU, time from arrival in the operating room (OR) to discharge, vomiting after the procedure, nausea requiring medicine, lowest oxygen saturation, highest concentration of sevoflurane, highest pain, amount of pain medicine, adverse events, and satisfaction of doctor performing the EGD. Group ETT had higher time from room arrival to airway placement, mask to airway placement, room arrival time to discharge, mask placement to discharge, airway placement to discharge, and end of procedure to discharge. Group ETT had a higher proportion of patients with vomiting than group LMA. No statistical difference was noted in endoscopist satisfaction when comparing ETT and LMA. The ETT group had 3 adverse events, including laryngospasm (n=2) and asthma attack (n=1). The LMA appears to be an acceptable and safe alternative for otherwise healthy children undergoing routine EGD. Benefits appear to be decreased incidence of vomiting and overall decreased time spent in the hospital.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 052972599

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24637966

DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000000348


Related references

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005(2): Cd003314, 2005

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3: Cd003314, 2018

Airway equipment and its maintenance for a non difficult adult airway management (endotracheal intubation and its alternative: face mask, laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube). Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation 22(Suppl. 1): 28s-40s, 2003

Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy. Medical Gas Research 7(3): 150-155, 2017

Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Bet 3. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation or bag-mask ventilation for cardiac arrest in adults. Emergency Medicine Journal 27(6): 477-479, 2010

Can the laryngeal mask airway replace endotracheal intubation for airway control? The argument for the laryngeal mask airway. Israel Medical Association Journal 6(4): 240, 2004

Cardiovascular stability during carotid endarterectomy: endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 10(1): 54-57, 1998

A Study of the Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in Children and its Comparison with Endotracheal Intubation. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 53(2): 174-178, 2009

Effect of endotracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway on perioperative respiratory adverse events in children with upper airway infections. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 93(45): 3626-3628, 2013

Combat trauma airway management: endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway versus combitube use by Navy SEAL and Reconnaissance combat corpsmen. Journal of Trauma 46(5): 927-932, 1999

A new general anesthetic technique for use in singers the brain laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation. Journal of Voice 4(1): 81-85, 1990

Intubating laryngeal mask airway versus laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in the nuclear, biological, and chemical environment. Military Medicine 168(11): 876-879, 2003

Laryngeal mask airway control versus endotracheal intubation by medical personnel wearing protective gear. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 22(1): 24-26, 2004

The laryngeal mask airway is equivalent to endotracheal intubation for positive pressure ventilation in children. Anesthesiology 85(3A): A1075, 1996

Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway versus blind endotracheal intubation in the simulated entrapped patient: a preliminary study. Air Medical Journal 20(2): 21-22, 2001