+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Establishment of one-axis vibration test system for measurement of biodynamic response of human hand-arm system



Establishment of one-axis vibration test system for measurement of biodynamic response of human hand-arm system



Industrial Health 46(6): 629-634



Prolonged exposure to hand-arm vibration (HAV) due to use of hand-held power tools leads to an increased occurrence of symptoms of disorders in the vascular, neurological, and osteo-articular systems of the upper limbs called hand-arm vibration syndrome (HAVS). Biodynamic responses of the hand-arm system to vibration can be suggestive parameters that give us better assessment of exposure to HAV and fundamental data for design of low-vibration-exposure power tools. Recently, a single axis hand-arm vibration system has been installed in the Japan National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). The aims of this study were to obtain the fundamental dynamic characteristics of an instrumented handle and to validate the performance and measurement accuracy of the system applied to dynamic response measurement. A pseudo-random vibration signal with a frequency range of 5-1,250 Hz and a power spectrum density of 1.0 (m/s2)2/Hz was used in this study. First the dynamic response of the instrumented handle without any weight was measured. After this measurement, the dynamic response measurement of the handle with weights mounted on the handle was performed. The apparent mass of a weight itself was obtained by using the mass cancellation method. The mass of the measuring cap on the instrumented handle was well compensated by using the mass cancellation method. Based on the 10% error tolerance, this handle can reliably measure the dynamic response represented by an apparent mass with a minimum weight of 2.0 g in a frequency range of 10.0 to 1,000 Hz. A marked increase in the AM magnitude of the weights of 15 g and 20 g in frequency ranges greater than 800 Hz is attributed not to the fundamental resonance frequency of the handle with weights, but to the fixation of the weight to the measuring cap. In this aspect, the peak of the AM magnitude can be reduced and hence should not be an obstacle to the biodynamic response measurement of the human hand-arm system. On the basis of the results obtained in this study, we conclude that this hand-arm vibration test system can be used to measure biodynamic response parameters of the human hand-arm system.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 053035314

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19088416


Related references

Biodynamic response of the seated human body to single-axis and dual-axis vibration: effect of backrest and non-linearity. Industrial Health 50(1): 37-51, 2012

Hand-transmitted vibration and biodynamic response of the human hand-arm: a critical review. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 29(4): 393-439, 2002

Biodynamic response at the palm of the human hand subjected to a random vibration. Industrial Health 43(1): 241-255, 2005

Biodynamic responses of the seated human body to single-axis and dual-axis vibration. Industrial Health 48(5): 615-627, 2011

Frequency weighting derived from power absorption of fingers-hand-arm system under z(h)-axis vibration. Journal of Biomechanics 39(12): 2311-2324, 2005

Modeling of biodynamic responses distributed at the fingers and the palm of the human hand-arm system. Journal of Biomechanics 40(10): 2335-2340, 2006

The influence of biodynamic factors on the absorption of vibration energy in the human hand and arm. Nagoya Journal of Medical Science 57(3-4): 159-167, 1994

Characteristics of vibration transmission in the hand-arm system and subjective response during field operation of a hand tractor. Biosystems Engineering 100(4): 535-546, 2008

Hand arm vibration part 3 a distributed parameter dynamic model of the human hand arm system/. Journal of Sound and Vibration 57(2): 157-170, 1978

Response of the seated human body to whole-body vertical vibration: biodynamic responses to sinusoidal and random vibration. Ergonomics 57(5): 693-713, 2015

A study of hand vibration on chipping and grinding operators 2. 4 degree of freedom lumped parameter model of the vibration response of the human hand. Journal of Sound and Vibration 95(4): 499-514, 1984

Review and Evaluation of Hand-Arm Coordinate Systems for Measuring Vibration Exposure, Biodynamic Responses, and Hand Forces. Safety and Health at Work 6(3): 159-173, 2016

The effects of whole-body vibration on human biodynamic response. Journal of Gravitational Physiology 2(1): P96-P99, 1995

Experimental study on biodynamic response to vibration in human and animals. Hang Tian Yi Xue Yu Yi Xue Gong Cheng 10(3): 163-167, 1997

Pallesthesiometry as a screening test in industrial medical examinations of workers with exposure of the hand-arm system to vibration. Zeitschrift für die Gesamte Hygiene und Ihre Grenzgebiete 27(4): 281-287, 1981