+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data

Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S53-S57

Electronic clinical data (ECD) will increasingly serve as an important source of information for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Although many retrospective studies have relied on ECD, new study designs propose using ECD for prospective CER. These designs have great potential but they also raise important ethics questions. Drawing on an ethics framework for learning health care systems, we identify morally relevant features of prospective CER-ECD studies by examining 1 case of an observational study and a second of a pragmatic, randomized trial. We focus only on questions of consent and assume research has been subject to appropriate ethics review and oversight. We conclude that a CER-ECD observational study that imposes no or minimal additional risk to or burden on patients may proceed ethically without express informed consent from participants in settings where: (a) patients are regularly informed of the health care institution's commitment to learning through the integration of research and practice; and (b) there are appropriate protections for patients' rights and interests. In addition, where (a) and (b) apply, some pragmatic, randomized trials that similarly impose no or minimal additional risk to or burden on patients may also proceed ethically without express consent, when certain additional conditions are satisfied, including: (c) the trial does not negatively affect patients' prospects for good clinical outcomes; (d) physicians have the option of using an intervention other than the one assigned if they believe doing so is important for a particular patient; and (e) the trial does not engage preferences or values that are meaningful to patients.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053047292

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23793051

DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829b1e4b

Related references

Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data. Medical Care 50 Suppl: Ii-Ii, 2012

A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 194-200, 2011

Alzheimer disease ethics--informed consent and related issues in clinical trials: results of a survey among the members of the Research Ethics Committees in Sweden. International Psychogeriatrics 15(2): 157-170, 2003

Ethics in clinical research: need for assessing comprehension of informed consent form?. Contemporary Clinical Trials 32(2): 169-172, 2011

Risk, respect for persons, and informed consent in comparative effectiveness research. American Journal of Bioethics 13(12): 46-48, 2014

Stakeholders' Views of Alternatives to Prospective Informed Consent for Minimal-Risk Pragmatic Comparative Effectiveness Trials. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43(2): 397-409, 2015

Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Include Risks of Standard Care. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 45(3): 352-364, 2017

Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17(5): 1601-1617, 1999

Supplement: Making Informed Consent Meaningful || The Decision Dynamics of Clinical Research: The Context and Process of Informed Consent. Medical Care 40(9): V45-V54, 2002

Informed consent and clinical research involving children and adolescents: implications of the revised APA ethics code and HIPAA. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 53 33(4): 832-839, 2004

Research ethics in practice. Research ethics committees do not guarantee the right to informed consent. Lakartidningen 89(25): 2292-2294, 1992

Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (): -, 2016

Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum. Medical Care 50 Suppl(): S11-S18, 2012

Informed Consent for Comparative Effectiveness Research Should Not Consider the Risks of the Standard Therapies That Are Being Studied as Risks of the Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 45(3): 365-374, 2017

iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2016