EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Evaluation of neonicotinoid, organophosphate and avermectin trunk injections for the management of avocado thrips in California avocado groves


Pest Management Science 68(5): 811-817
Evaluation of neonicotinoid, organophosphate and avermectin trunk injections for the management of avocado thrips in California avocado groves
Trunk injections of systemic insecticides were evaluated for the management of avocado thrips. Insecticide residues were quantified in leaves to determine when after treatment, and for how long, toxic concentrations of the insecticides were present. Residues in fruit were quantified to determine whether trunk injection of insecticides might present a greater risk than traditional application methods for contaminating fruit. Residues of imidacloprid and dinotefuran were at least tenfold higher in leaves when trees were treated via trunk injection compared with soil application. Dinotefuran uptake was more rapid than imidacloprid, and no residues were detected within fruit. Acephate was also mobilized very rapidly and gave good control of thrips in bioassays; however, residues of acephate and its insecticidal metabolite methamidophos were detected in the fruit for up to 4 weeks after injection. Avermectin uptake was very slow, and it was ineffective against avocado thrips. Trunk injections of acephate and dinotefuran permitted rapid uptake into avocados, and they are strong candidates as control methods for avocado thrips. However, residues of organophosphates in fruit could necessitate increased preharvest intervals. Residues of neonicotinoids were below detection limits in fruit, suggesting that neonicotinoids may be the more suitable control option of the two chemical classes.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 053076321

PMID: 22396314

DOI: 10.1002/ps.2337



Related references

Field evaluation of systemic imidacloprid for the management of avocado thrips and avocado lace bug in California avocado groves. Pest Management Science 66(10): 1129-1136, 2011

Toxicity of systemic neonicotinoid insecticides to avocado thrips in nursery avocado trees. Pest Management Science 63(9): 860-866, 2007

Assessing organic mulches for avocado thrips control in California avocado orchards. California Conference on Biological Control III, University of California at Davis, USA, 15-16 August, 2002: 129-133, 2002

Soil acidity in California avocado groves. Avocado grower: 2 (1) 40-41, 1978

Suppression of phytophthora root rot in several soils from california avocado groves. Phytopathology 81(10): 1165, 1991

Avocado thrips: a serious new pest of avocados in California. California Avocado Society Yearbook 81: 81-90, 1997

Report of the Avocado Variety Committee of the California Avocado Society, June 5, 1948. Yearbook of the California Avocado Society for the year, 1949. 10-14, 1949

The parent Fuerte avocado. Three quarters of California avocado industry traces to Mexican tree. Jour Heredity 28(5): 181-182, 1937

Avocado varieties recently registered with the California Avocado Society. California Avocado Society Yearbook 59: 41-51, 1976

Evaluation of herbicides for avocado groves. Proceedings Florida State Horticultural Society 90: 263-266, 1977