+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation for use in combat operations more than 12 hours after injury



Evaluation of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation for use in combat operations more than 12 hours after injury



Military Medicine 175(7): 477-481



The diagnosis and management of concussion can be difficult in a combat environment, especially in the absence of loss of consciousness or post-traumatic amnesia. As no validated test exists to diagnose or grade neurocognitive impairment from a concussion, the military currently employs the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) in Iraq. This is a two-part test, which incorporates the standardized assessment of concussion (SAC) as its objective score, although it has not been shown to be valid unless administered shortly after injury. A research team deployed to Iraq between January and April 2009 to examine the validity of several tests of neurocognitive function following a concussion, including the MACE. When administered more than 12 hours after the concussive injury, the MACE lacked sufficient sensitivity and specificity to be clinically useful.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 053082579

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20684450


Related references

Day of injury cognitive performance on the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) by U.S. military service members in OEF/OIF. Military Medicine 179(9): 990-997, 2014

Utility of the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation as a screening tool for mild traumatic brain injury in a civilian trauma population. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 79(1): 147-151, 2015

Military Acute Concussion Evaluation screen in a civilian population. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 80(2): 351-352, 2016

Re: Military Acute Concussion Evaluation screen in a civilian population. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 80(2): 352-353, 2016

Combat readiness for the modern military surgeon: data from a decade of combat operations. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery 73(2 Suppl 1): S64-S70, 2012

Comparison of combat and non-combat burns from ongoing U.S. military operations. Journal of Surgical Research 132(2): 195-200, 2006

Improving identification and diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury with evidence: psychometric support for the acute concussion evaluation. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 23(4): 230-242, 2008

Evaluation context impacts neuropsychological performance of OEF/OIF veterans with reported combat-related concussion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 25(8): 713-723, 2010

Surgical treatment for acute spinal cord injury study pilot study #2: evaluation of protocol for decompressive surgery within 8 hours of injury. Neurosurgical Focus 6(1): E3, 1999

Utility of a sports medicine model in military combat concussion and musculoskeletal restoration care. Military Medicine 179(11): 1319-1324, 2014

Frequent binge drinking after combat-acquired traumatic brain injury among active duty military personnel with a past year combat deployment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 27(5): 349-360, 2013

Epidemiologic aspects of traumatic brain injury in acute combat casualties at a major military medical center: a cohort study. Annals of Neurology 72(5): 673-681, 2012

Use of a multi-level mixed methods approach to study the effectiveness of a primary care progressive return to activity protocol after acute mild traumatic brain injury/concussion in the military. Contemporary Clinical Trials 52: 95, 2017

Combat urologic trauma in US military overseas contingency operations. Journal of Trauma 69(Suppl. 1): S175-S178, 2010