+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of the environmental impact of Brownfield remediation options: comparison of two life cycle assessment-based evaluation tools



Evaluation of the environmental impact of Brownfield remediation options: comparison of two life cycle assessment-based evaluation tools



Environmental Technology 33(19-21): 2447-2459



The choice between different options for the remediation of a contaminated site traditionally relies on economical, technical and regulatory criteria without consideration of the environmental impact of the soil remediation process itself. In the present study, the environmental impact assessment of two potential soil remediation techniques (excavation and off-site cleaning and in situ steam extraction) was performed using two life cycle assessment (LCA)-based evaluation tools, namely the REC (risk reduction, environmental merit and cost) method and the ReCiPe method. The comparison and evaluation of the different tools used to estimate the environmental impact of Brownfield remediation was based on a case study which consisted of the remediation of a former oil and fat processing plant. For the environmental impact assessment, both the REC and ReCiPe methods result in a single score for the environmental impact of the soil remediation process and allow the same conclusion to be drawn: excavation and off-site cleaning has a more pronounced environmental impact than in situ soil remediation by means of steam extraction. The ReCiPe method takes into account more impact categories, but is also more complex to work with and needs more input data. Within the routine evaluation of soil remediation alternatives, a detailed LCA evaluation will often be too time consuming and costly and the estimation of the environmental impact with the REC method will in most cases be sufficient. The case study worked out in this paper wants to provide a basis for a more sounded selection of soil remediation technologies based on a more detailed assessment of the secondary impact of soil remediation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053085227

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23393988

DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2012.671854


Related references

Estimating Social Impacts of a Remediation Project Life Cycle With Environmental Footprint Evaluation Tools. Remediation Journal 24(1): 5-20, 2013

Evaluating holistic environmental consequences of brownfield management options using consequential life cycle assessment for different perspectives. Environmental Management 40(2): 323-337, 2007

Life cycle assessment of mobility options using wood based fuels--comparison of selected environmental effects and costs. Bioresource Technology 150: 420-428, 2013

Accounting for land-use efficiency and temporal variations between brownfield remediation alternatives in life-cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 101: 109-117, 2015

Comparative evaluation of life cycle impact assessment software tools through a wind turbine case study. Renewable Energy 74: 237-246, 2015

Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA. Journal of Environmental Management 92(9): 2235-2240, 2011

Environmental impact evaluation of feeds prepared from food residues using life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Quality 36(4): 1061-1068, 2007

Environmental impact assessment of municipal solid waste management options using life cycle assessment: a case study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 25(1): 838-854, 2018

Life cycle assessment: A comparison of three methods for impact analysis and evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production 2(1): 13-20, 1994

Evaluation of the environmental impact of experimental cubicles using Life Cycle Assessment: A highlight on the manufacturing phase. Applied Energy 92: 534-544, 2012

Life Cycle Assessment, ExternE and Comprehensive Analysis for an integrated evaluation of the environmental impact of anthropogenic activities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13(5): 1039-1048, 2009

Environmental assessment of Brownfield rehabilitation using two different life cycle inventory models. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12(6): 391-398, 2007

Land use impact evaluation in life cycle assessment based on ecosystem thermodynamics. Energy Oxford 31(1): 112-125, 2006

Evaluation of the environmental impact of experimental buildings with different constructive systems using Material Flow Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment. Applied Energy 109: 544-552, 2013

Environmental impacts of remediation of a trichloroethene-contaminated site: life cycle assessment of remediation alternatives. Environmental Science and Technology 44(23): 9163-9169, 2010