+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of the equity of age-sex adjusted primary care capitation payments in Ontario, Canada



Evaluation of the equity of age-sex adjusted primary care capitation payments in Ontario, Canada



Health Policy 104(2): 186-192



Several innovative primary care models have recently been introduced in Ontario, Canada. Two of these models are funded primarily through age-sex based capitation. There is concern that adjusting capitation rates for age and sex alone does not take into account the increased morbidity burden and health care needs that are associated with lower socioeconomic status. This study assesses the extent to which the current age-sex capitation rates in Ontario reflect health care needs of patients across socioeconomic status by comparing Ontario's age-sex adjusted capitation remuneration rate index with relative expected health care resource use by socioeconomic status (SES). This study used administrative data collected by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. The study sample was those patients who were enrolled to a FHN continuously from September 1, 2005 to August 31, 2006. Standardized expected health care utilization was calculated based on morbidity burden using The Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) Case-mix System and compared with standardized capitation rates across and within neighbourhood income quintiles. Among those in the lowest income group expected utilization was much higher than the age-sex capitation rates, while the opposite was true for those in the highest income group. The findings suggests that under the physician reimbursement system used in Family Health Networks in Ontario, physicians are under-compensated for the health care needs of low income patients and over-compensated for the needs of high income patients. Adjusting capitation rates for morbidity burden in addition to age and sex may reduce incentives to preferentially enrol patients with higher socioeconomic status.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053085237

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22078665

DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.008


Related references

Do Incentive Payments Reward The Wrong Providers? A Study Of Primary Care Reform In Ontario, Canada. Health Affairs 38(4): 624-632, 2019

Primary care capitation payments in the UK. An observational study. Bmc Health Services Research 10: 156, 2010

An evaluation of gender equity in different models of primary care practices in Ontario. Bmc Public Health 10: 151, 2010

High Levels Of Capitation Payments Needed To Shift Primary Care Toward Proactive Team And Nonvisit Care. Health Affairs 36(9): 1599-1605, 2017

Medicare risk-adjusted capitation payments: from research to implementation. Health Care Financing Review 21(3): 1-5, 2000

Risk-adjusted capitation payments for catastrophic risks based on multi-year prior costs. Health Policy 39(2): 123-135, 1997

Risk-adjusted capitation payments: developing a diagnostic cost groups classification for the Dutch situation. Health Policy 45(1): 15-32, 1998

Mandatory pooling as a supplement to risk-adjusted capitation payments in a competitive health insurance market. Social Science and Medicine 47(2): 223-232, 1998

Free choice of health plan combined with risk-adjusted capitation payments: are switchers and new enrolees good risks?. Health Economics 15(8): 763-774, 2006

Risk-adjusted capitation payments: how well do principal inpatient diagnosis-based models work in the German situation? Results from a large data set. European Journal of Health Economics 8(1): 31-39, 2007

Nutrition care practices of primary care providers for weight management in multidisciplinary primary care settings in Ontario, Canada - a qualitative study. Bmc Family Practice 19(1): 69, 2018

A new primary care rostering and capitation system in Norway: lessons for Canada?. Cmaj 157(1): 45-50, 1997

Age equity in different models of primary care practice in Ontario. Canadian Family Physician Medecin de Famille Canadien 57(11): 1300-1309, 2011

Public payments to physicians in Ontario adjusted for overhead costs. Healthcare Policy 8(2): 30-36, 2012

Capitation and primary care in Canada: financial incentives and the evolution of health service organizations. International Journal of Health Services 31(3): 583-603, 2001