+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain

Exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in recurrent chest pain

World Journal of Gastroenterology 16(34): 4305-4312

To investigate the diagnostic efficacy of 24-h and exertional esophageal pH-metry and manometry in patients with recurrent chest pain. The study included 111 patients (54% male) with recurrent angina-like chest pain, non-responsive to therapy with proton pump inhibitors. Sixty-five (59%) had non-obstructive lesions in coronary artery angiography, and in 46 (41%) significant coronary artery narrowing was found. In all patients, 24-h esophageal pH-metry and manometry, and treadmill stress tests with simultaneous esophageal pH-metry and manometry monitoring were performed. During a 24-h examination the percentage of spontaneous chest pain (sCP) episodes associated with acid reflux or dysmotility (symptom index, SI) was calculated. Patients with SI > 50% for acid gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were classified as having GER-related sCP. The remaining symptomatic individuals were determined as having non-GER-related sCP. During the stress test, the occurrence of chest pain, episodes of esophageal acidification (pH < 4 for 10 s) and esophageal spasm with more than 55% of simultaneous contractions (exercise-provoked esophageal spasm or EPES) were noted. Sixty-eight (61%) individuals reported sCP during 24-h esophageal function monitoring. Eleven of these (16%) were classified as having GER-related sCP and 53/68 (84%) as having non-GER-related sCP. The exercise-provoked chest pain during a stress test occurred in 13/111 (12%) subjects. In order to compare the clinical usefulness of 24-h esophageal function monitoring and its examination limited only to the treadmill stress test, the standard parameters of diagnostic test evaluation were determined. The occurrence of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP was assumed as a "gold standard". Afterwards, accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated. These parameters expressed a prediction of GER-related or non-GER-related sCP occurrence by the presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES. Accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of chest pain during the stress test predicting any sCP occurrence were 28%, 35% and 80%, respectively, predicting GER-related sCP were 42%, 0% and 83%, respectively, and predicting non-GER-related sCP were 57%, 36% and 83%, respectively. Similar values were obtained for exercise-related acidification with pH < 4 longer than 10 s in the prediction of GER-related sCP (44%, 36% and 92%, respectively) and EPES in relation to non-GER-related sCP (48%, 23% and 84%, respectively). The presence of chest pain, esophageal acidification and EPES had greater than 80% specificity to exclude the GER-related and non-GER-related causes of recurrent chest pain.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 053119216

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20818814

Related references

Quantitative comparison of combined ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry in control subjects, patients with atypical chest pain, and patients with chest pain and dysphagia. Clinical & Investigative Medicine 16(4 Suppl. ): B44, 1993

Ambulatory esophageal manometry, pH-metry, and Holter ECG monitoring in patients with atypical chest pain. Digestive Diseases & Sciences. 38(5): 795-802, 1993

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry and pH-metry in patients with noncardiac chest pain, but no reflux symptoms. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences 13(5): 293-300, 1997

Combined holter ekg monitoring ambulatory esophageal manometry and ph metry in the evaluation of patients with atypical angina like chest pain. Gastroenterology 98(5 Part 2): A105, 1990

Exertional gastroesophageal pH-metry: a new provocative physiological test in the diagnosis of chest pain. Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique 17(1): 4-8, 1993

Ambulatory 24-hour esophageal manometry in the evaluation of esophageal motor disorders and noncardiac chest pain. Surgery 110(4): 753, 1991

Comparison of intravenous edrophonium and esophageal acid perfusion during esophageal manometry in patients with non cardiac chest pain. Gut 29(8): 1029-1034, 1988

Angina-like chest pain and exertional esophageal ph monitoring. Gastroenterologie Clinique et Biologique 23(3): 313-318, 1999

Esophageal dysfunction and chest pain in patients with mitral valve prolapse a prospective study utilizing provocative testing during esophageal manometry. American Journal of Medicine 86(1): 32-38, 1989

Esophageal manometry and 24-h esophageal pH-metry in a large sample of patients with respiratory symptoms. Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia 34(12): 1040-1048, 2008

Ambulatory esophageal manometry/pH-metry discriminates between patients with different esophageal symptoms. Digestive Diseases & Sciences. 41(2): 357-364, 1996

Chest pain and esophageal motility: what is the role of manometry?. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology 4(5): 466-467, 1982

Esophageal manometry in patients with non cardiac chest pain. Revista Medica de Chile 134(3): 291-298, 2006