+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women



Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women



Bmc Public Health 11: 264



Cervical cancer incidence and mortality may be reduced by organized screening. Participant compliance with the attendance recommendations of the screening program is necessary to achieve this. Knowledge about the predictors of compliance is needed in order to enhance screening attendance. The Norwegian Co-ordinated Cervical Cancer Screening Program (NCCSP) registers all cervix cytology diagnoses in Norway and individually reminds women who have no registered smear for the past three years to make an appointment for screening. In the present study, a questionnaire on lifestyle and health was administered to a random sample of Norwegian women. The response rate was 68%. To address the predictors of screening attendance for the 12,058 women aged 25-45 who were eligible for this study, individual questionnaire data was linked to the cytology registry of the NCCSP. We distinguished between non-attendees, opportunistic attendees and reminded attendees to screening for a period of four years. Predictors of non-attendance versus attendance and reminded versus opportunistic attendance were established by multivariate logistic regression. Women who attended screening were more likely than non-attendees to report that they were aware of the recommended screening interval, a history of sexually transmitted infections and a history of hormonal contraceptive and condom use. Attendance was also positively associated with being married/cohabiting, being a non-smoker and giving birth. Women who attended after being reminded were more likely than opportunistic attendees to be aware of cervical cancer and the recommended screening interval, but less likely to report a history of sexually transmitted infections and hormonal contraceptive use. Moreover, the likelihood of reminded attendance increased with age. Educational level did not significantly affect the women's attendance status in the fully adjusted models. The likelihood of attendance in an organized screening program was higher among women who were aware of cervical screening, which suggests a potential for a higher attendance rate through improving the public knowledge of screening. Further, the lower awareness among opportunistic than reminded attendees suggests that physicians may inform their patients better when smears are taken at the physician's initiative.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053193781

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21521515

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-264


Related references

What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 83(9): 547-551, 1990

Factors affecting attendance to cervical cancer screening among women in the Paracentral Region of El Salvador: a nested study within the CAPE HPV screening program. Bmc Public Health 15: 1058, 2016

The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Re-attendance related to the women's experiences, intentions and previous screening result. Cancer Causes & Control 14(4): 391-398, 2003

The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program: Re-Attendance Related to the Women's Experiences, Intentions and Previous Screening Result. Cancer Causes & Control 14(4): 391-398, 2003

Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening. Bmc Health Services Research 16(1): 519, 2016

The attendance of the first screening round (2002-2003) of the Hungarian organized breast cancer screening program and its effect on the number of diagnostic and screening mammography. Orvosi Hetilap 146(38): 1963-1970, 2005

Poor Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance and False Negatives. A Call for Organized Screening. Plos One 11(8): E0161403, 2017

When Life Got in the Way: How Danish and Norwegian Immigrant Women in Sweden Reason about Cervical Screening and Why They Postpone Attendance. Plos One 10(7): E0107624-E0107624, 2016

The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program Is re-attendance related to screening outcome and the womens attitude and experiences to the program?. European Journal of Cancer 38(Suppl. 3): S165, 2002

Attendance of the fourth (2008-2009) screening round of the Hungarian organized, nationwide breast cancer screening program. Orvosi Hetilap 154(50): 1975-1983, 2016

Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention. International Journal of Cancer 133(4): 972-983, 2013

Cervical cancer screening program in Thimphu, Bhutan: population coverage and characteristics associated with screening attendance. Bmc Women's Health 14: 147, 2015

Australian women's cervical cancer screening attendance as a function of screening barriers and facilitators. Social Science & Medicine 220: 396-402, 2018

Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics. Journal of Advanced Nursing 28(3): 571-575, 1998

Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women. Bmc Women's Health 14(1): 33, 2014