+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season



Factors that influence standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma: test reliability, technician experience, time of day, and season



Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 53(11): 7010-7017



To determine the influence of several factors on standard automated perimetry test results in glaucoma. Longitudinal Humphrey field analyzer 30-2 Swedish interactive threshold algorithm data from 160 eyes of 160 glaucoma patients were used. The influence of technician experience, time of day, and season on the mean deviation (MD) was determined by performing linear regression analysis of MD against time on a series of visual fields and subsequently performing a multiple linear regression analysis with the MD residuals as dependent variable and the factors mentioned above as independent variables. Analyses were performed with and without adjustment for the test reliability (fixation losses and false-positive and false-negative answers) and with and without stratification according to disease stage (baseline MD). Mean follow-up was 9.4 years, with on average 10.8 tests per patient. Technician experience, time of day, and season were associated with the MD. Approximately 0.2 dB lower MD values were found for inexperienced technicians (P < 0.001), tests performed after lunch (P < 0.001), and tests performed in the summer or autumn (P < 0.001). The effects of time of day and season appeared to depend on disease stage. Independent of these effects, the percentage of false-positive answers strongly influenced the MD with a 1 dB increase in MD per 10% increase in false-positive answers. Technician experience, time of day, season, and the percentage of false-positive answers have a significant influence on the MD of standard automated perimetry.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053199149

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22952121

DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-10268


Related references

Influence of multifocal intraocular lenses on standard automated perimetry test results. JAMA Ophthalmology 131(4): 481-485, 2013

Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 61(10): 576-579, 2013

Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 86(2): 170-176, 2008

Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Ophthalmology 113(7): 1092-1097, 2006

The influence of experience on mean defect and reliability factors in automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Sciencestr. Issue: 356, 1988

Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry, Short-Wavelength Automated Perimetry, and Frequency-Doubling Technology Perimetry to Monitor Glaucoma Progression. Medicine 95(7): E2618, 2016

Comparison of standard automated perimetry, frequency-doubling technology perimetry, and short-wavelength automated perimetry for detection of glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52(10): 7325-7331, 2011

A comparison of long term variability in standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. IOVS 40(4): S581, 1999

Effect of yellow-tinted intraocular lens on standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology 21(3): 216-219, 2014

A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma. Oftalmologia 50(2): 94, 2006

The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Acta Ophthalmologica 87(4): 429-432, 2009

Riots real time interactive optimized test sequence a heuristic software test strategy for automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 31(4 ABSTR ISSUE): 191, 1990

Priority of test locations for automated perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 100(4): 518-522, 1993

Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 36(8): 1658-1664, 1995