+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition



Fetal growth parameters and birth weight: their relationship to neonatal body composition



Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 33(4): 441-446



The main goal was to investigate the relationship between prenatal sonographic parameters and birth weight in predicting neonatal body composition. Standard fetal biometry and soft tissue parameters were assessed prospectively in third-trimester pregnancies using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Growth parameters included biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-thigh circumference and femoral diaphysis length (FDL). Soft tissue parameters included fractional arm volume (AVol) and fractional thigh volume (TVol) that were derived from 50% of the humeral or femoral diaphysis lengths, respectively. Percentage of neonatal body fat (%BF) was determined within 48 h of delivery using a pediatric air displacement plethysmography system based on principles of whole-body densitometry. Correlation and stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were performed with potential prenatal predictors and %BF as the outcome variable. Eighty-seven neonates were studied with a mean +/- SD %BF of 10.6 +/- 4.6%. TVol had the greatest correlation with newborn %BF of all single-parameter models. This parameter alone explained 46.1% of the variability in %BF and the best stepwise multiple linear regression model was: %BF = 0.129 (TVol) - 1.03933 (P < 0.001). Birth weight similarly explained 44.7% of the variation in %BF. AC and estimated fetal weight (EFW) accounted for only 24.8% and 30.4% of the variance in %BF, respectively. Skeletal growth parameters, such as FDL (14.2%), HC (7.9%) and BPD (4.0%), contributed the least towards explaining the variance in %BF. During the late third trimester of pregnancy %BF is most highly correlated with TVol. Similar to actual birth weight, this soft tissue parameter accounts for a significant improvement in explaining the variation in neonatal %BF compared with fetal AC or EFW alone.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053232216

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19253324

DOI: 10.1002/uog.6317


Related references

OP27.01: Third trimester fetal arm and thigh fat mass: their relationship to estimated fetal weight, birth weight and neonatal body composition. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 34(S1): 149-149, 2009

PS-273The Relationship Between Infant Birth Weight And Neonatal Body Composition. Archives of Disease in Childhood 99(Suppl 2): A211.1-A211, 2014

The relationship of newborn adiposity to fetal growth outcome based on birth weight or the modified neonatal growth assessment score. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 25(10): 1933-1940, 2013

Feasibility of catch up growth and maintenance of fetal body composition in low birth weight lbw infants. Pediatric Research 27(4 PART 2): 285A, 1990

Effects of birth weight and postnatal nutrition on neonatal sheep: I. Body growth and composition, and some aspects of energetic efficiency. Journal of Animal Science 76(9): 2354-2367, 1998

Impact of fetal growth restriction on body composition and hormonal status at birth in infants of small and appropriate weight for gestational age. European Journal of Endocrinology 157(5): 605-612, 2007

Fetal programming of body composition: relation between birth weight and body composition measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometric methods in older Englishmen. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82(5): 980-987, 2005

Evaluation methods for intrauterine growth using neonatal fat stores instead of birth weight as outcome measures fetal and neonatal measurements correlated with neonatal skinfold thicknesses. Journal of Clinical Ultrasound 18(1): 9-14, 1990

Risk of ultrasound-detected neonatal brain abnormalities in intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses born between 28 and 34 weeks' gestation: relationship with gestational age at birth and fetal Doppler parameters. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 46(4): 452-459, 2016

Growth, body composition and hormonal status of growing pigs exhibiting a normal or small weight at birth and exposed to a neonatal diet enriched in proteins. British Journal of Nutrition 105(10): 1471-1479, 2011

Relationship between birth weight and other neonatal anthropometric parameters. Indian Pediatrics 25(3): 244-248, 1988

Birth weight: relationship with other fetal anthropometric parameters. Indian Pediatrics 21(11): 833-838, 1984

Growth velocity of some fetal parameters. II. Body weight, body length and head circumference. Biology of the Neonate 62(5): 317-324, 1992

The relationship of age and body weight of heifers at early conception with birth weight and growth of their calves. Zivocisna Vyroba 28(2): 97-102, 1983

Relationship between the body composition of the mother and the birth weight of the infant. Josanpu Zasshi 22(7): 57-60, 1968