+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?



Fitting a square peg into a round hole: are the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines feasible for Africa?



Critical Care 15(1): 117



In their article, Baelani and colleagues surveyed anesthesia providers from African low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to evaluate whether or not the current Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines are feasible in such resource-constrained settings. The authors report that an alarmingly low percentage of hospitals have the capacity to implement the SSC guidelines in their entirety but a higher percentage are able to implement the majority of SSC guidelines and grade 1 recommendations. In reality, the probability of adherence to SSC guidelines for septic management is even lower than reported, given that the majority of sepsis management in African LMICs is likely performed by non-intensivists outside of intensive care units. Efforts to address the challenges of managing severely ill patients in LMICs have recently been taken on by the World Health Organization. After reviewing available evidence for sepsis management predominantly from high-income countries, a panel of experts developed a consensus-based strategy tailored for resource-limited settings. However, more research that can evaluate the challenges specific to sepsis management in LMICs and not currently addressed by the SSC guidelines is needed. Comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines combined with innovative approaches to sepsis management in LMICs are required to make a meaningful impact on worldwide sepsis survival.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053255205

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21345262

DOI: 10.1186/cc9981


Related references

Brain not processing: is finding a role for BNP in sepsis like fitting a square peg into a round hole?. Critical Care 18(4): 161, 2015

Sepsis and Shock Response Team: Impact of a Multidisciplinary Approach to Implementing Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and Surviving the Process. American Journal of Medical Quality 32(5): 500-507, 2016

A campaign worth joining: improving outcome in severe sepsis and septic shock using the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Southern Medical Journal 100(6): 557-558, 2007

A Multicenter Survey of House Staff Knowledge About Sepsis and the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock". Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2017: 885066617737304, 2017

Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine 32(3): 858-873, 2004

Revised Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines and therapy for severe sepsis. Japanese Journal of Antibiotics 64(1): 37-44, 2011

Epidemiology and Changes in Mortality of Sepsis After the Implementation of Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2017: 885066617711882, 2017

Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for severe sepsis and septic shock: we could go faster. Journal of Critical Care 23(4): 455-460, 2008

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Medicine 43(3): 304-377, 2017

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Critical Care Medicine 45(3): 486-552, 2017

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Critical Care and Resuscitation 10(1): 8, 2008

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Critical Care Medicine 36(1): 296-327, 2007

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Intensive Care Medicine 34(4): 783-785, 2008

Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical Care Medicine 41(2): 580-637, 2013

Harmonizing assessment of conservation with that of ecological quality: fitting a square peg into a round hole?. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19(4): 365-369, 2009