+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation



Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation



Ear and Hearing 31(2): 195-201



Our aim was to assess, for patients with a cochlear implant in one ear and low-frequency acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear, whether reducing the overlap in frequencies conveyed in the acoustic signal and those analyzed by the cochlear implant speech processor would improve speech recognition. The recognition of monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise was evaluated in three listening configurations: electric stimulation alone, acoustic stimulation alone, and combined electric and acoustic stimulation. The acoustic stimuli were either unfiltered or low-pass (LP) filtered at 250, 500, or 750 Hz. The electric stimuli were either unfiltered or high-pass (HP) filtered at 250, 500, or 750 Hz. In the combined condition, the unfiltered acoustic signal was paired with the unfiltered electric signal, the 250-Hz LP acoustic signal was paired with the 250-Hz HP electric signal, the 500-Hz LP acoustic signal was paired with the 500-Hz HP electric signal, and the 750-Hz LP acoustic signal was paired with the 750-Hz HP electric signal. For both acoustic and electric signals, performance increased as the bandwidth increased. The highest level of performance in the combined condition was observed in the unfiltered acoustic plus unfiltered electric condition. Reducing the overlap in frequency representation between acoustic and electric stimulation does not increase speech understanding scores for patients who have residual hearing in the ear contralateral to the implant. We find that acoustic information <250 Hz significantly improves performance for patients who combine electric and acoustic stimulation and accounts for the majority of the speech-perception benefit when acoustic stimulation is combined with electric stimulation.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053303865

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19915474

DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181c4758d


Related references

Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Plos one 9(11): E112471, 2014

The perception of telephone-processed speech by combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Trends in Amplification 17(3): 189-196, 2014

Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison. Ear and Hearing 36(6): E314-E325, 2016

Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55(1): 105-124, 2012

Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Ear and Hearing 34(3): 324-332, 2013

The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear and Hearing 29(1): 76-86, 2008

Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50(5): 1194-1202, 2007

Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear and Hearing 31(1): 63-69, 2010

Electric-acoustic stimulation in adults: localization and speech perception. Cochlear Implants International 15(Suppl. 1): S17-S20, 2014

The Psychophysics of Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing in Electric and Acoustic Stimulation (Eas) and Bimodal Patients. Journal of Hearing Science 2(2): 33-44, 2012

Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty. Ear and Hearing 38(5): 539-553, 2017

Influence of Test Condition on Speech Perception With Electric-Acoustic Stimulation. American Journal of Audiology 24(4): 520-528, 2015

Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception. Otology and Neurotology 40(2): E94-E98, 2019

The advantages of sound localization and speech perception of bilateral electric acoustic stimulation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 135(2): 147-153, 2015

Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet?. Otology and Neurotology 31(7): 1049-1054, 2010