+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Full publication of clinical trials presented at a national maternal-fetal medicine meeting: is there a publication bias?

Full publication of clinical trials presented at a national maternal-fetal medicine meeting: is there a publication bias?

American Journal of Perinatology 26(9): 679-682

We sought to determine the rate and timing of full publication of clinical trials initially presented as abstracts at a national maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) research meeting and identify factors associated with publication status. All abstracts presented over a 3-year period (2000 to 2002) at the Society of MFM Annual Meeting were reviewed. Abstracts reporting outcomes for prospective, interventional research studies with human subjects were included. Multiple electronic databases were searched for evidence of full publication with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. The reporting characteristics of abstracts that were published as full research reports were compared with those not published. During the study period, 2012 abstracts were presented and 90 met all study criteria (4.5%). Of these, 55.6% (n = 50) were subsequently published as full research reports. There were no differences in the use of placebo, randomization, or blinding. Studies reaching full publication had larger sample size (median 174 [12 to 4165] versus 96 [22 to 1039]; p = 0.02) and were more likely to report treatment differences (60% versus 32.5% p = 0.009). After adjusting for confounding factors, the reporting of treatment differences remained associated with full publication (odds ratio 3.3 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 8.0]; p = 0.01). Full publication of clinical trials occurred more often if treatment differences were present. Positive publication bias exists in MFM research.

Accession: 053317041

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19391085

DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1220786

Related references

Full text publication rates of studies presented at an international emergency medicine scientific meeting. Emergency Medicine Journal 28(9): 802-803, 2011

Transition from congress abstract to full publication for clinical trials presented at laser meetings. Lasers in Medical Science 23(3): 295-299, 2007

Do data presented at an American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics meeting make it to full publication?. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 75(1): 123-124, 2004

Time to full publication of studies of anticancer drugs for breast cancer, and the potential for publication bias. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 26(1): 110-116, 2010

Publication bias in papers presented to the Australian Orthopaedic Association Annual Scientific Meeting. Anz Journal of Surgery 76(6): 427-431, 2006

Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis. Human Reproduction 32(8): 1658-1666, 2018

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: mandatory publication of data may help. BMJ 331(7517): 638-638, 2005

Publication bias for CAM trials in the highest impact factor medicine journals is partly due to geographical bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60(11): 1123-1126, 2007

Time to full publication of studies of anti-cancer medicines for breast cancer and the potential for publication bias: a short systematic review. Health Technology Assessment 12(32): Iii, Ix-X, 1-46, 2008

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. BMJ 315(7109): 640-645, 1997

Publication bias of randomized controlled trials in emergency medicine. Academic Emergency Medicine 13(1): 102-108, 2005

Publication bias in clinical trials. Journal 76: A175, 2011

NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials Doc No 50: 4967 Words; 53 Paragraphs - 4967 Words; 53 Paragraphs, 1993

Publication bias and clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials 8(4): 343-353, 1987

Review of publication bias in studies on publication bias: studies on publication bias are probably susceptible to the bias they study. BMJ 331(7517): 637-638, 2005