+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing

Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130(4): 2054-2062

Cochlear implant (CI) users have been shown to benefit from residual low-frequency hearing, specifically in pitch related tasks. It remains unclear whether this benefit is dependent on fundamental frequency (F0) or other acoustic cues. Three experiments were conducted to determine the role of F0, as well as its frequency modulated (FM) and amplitude modulated (AM) components, in speech recognition with a competing voice. In simulated CI listeners, the signal-to-noise ratio was varied to estimate the 50% correct response. Simulation results showed that the F0 cue contributes to a significant proportion of the benefit seen with combined acoustic and electric hearing, and additionally that this benefit is due to the FM rather than the AM component. In actual CI users, sentence recognition scores were collected with either the full F0 cue containing both the FM and AM components or the 500-Hz low-pass speech cue containing the F0 and additional harmonics. The F0 cue provided a benefit similar to the low-pass cue for speech in noise, but not in quiet. Poorer CI users benefited more from the F0 cue than better users. These findings suggest that F0 is critical to improving speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053331739

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21973360

DOI: 10.1121/1.3631563

Related references

Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation. Ear and Hearing 31(2): 195-201, 2010

Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field. Ear and Hearing 34(3): 324-332, 2013

Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty. Ear and Hearing 38(5): 539-553, 2017

The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear and Hearing 29(1): 76-86, 2008

Advantages from bilateral hearing in speech perception in noise with simulated cochlear implants and residual acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(2): 1017-1030, 2013

Clear speech perception in acoustic and electric hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(4 Pt 1): 2374-2383, 2004

Acoustic Cues for Consonant Perception with Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing in Children. Seminars in Hearing 32(01): 032-041, 2011

Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation. Cochlear Implants International 14(3): 150-157, 2013

Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation. Hno 65(3): 237-242, 2017

Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception. Otology and Neurotology 40(2): E94-E98, 2019

Contributions of electric and acoustic hearing to bimodal speech and music perception. Plos one 10(3): E0120279, 2015

Temporal resolution in regions of normal hearing and speech perception in noise for adults with sloping high-frequency hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 31(1): 115-125, 2010

Fundamental frequency discrimination and speech perception in noise in cochlear implant simulations. Hearing Research 231(1-2): 42-53, 2007

Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125(3): 1658-1665, 2009

Speech perception in simulated electric hearing exploits information-bearing acoustic change. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133(2): El136-El141, 2013