+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Growth potential of U-clip interrupted versus polypropylene running suture anastomosis in congenital cardiac surgery: intermediate term results



Growth potential of U-clip interrupted versus polypropylene running suture anastomosis in congenital cardiac surgery: intermediate term results



Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 9(4): 565-570



Although U-clip anastomoses were studied for hemodynamics and patency, their potential for unimpeded growth after congenital cardiovascular surgery has not been investigated yet. In 53 children aged 2.1+/-3.3 years operated on between March 1998 and August 2005 growth of U-clip (U) vs. polypropylene running sutured (P) anastomoses in coarctation repair (Coarc; n=26), bi-directional Glenn (BDG; n=13) and arterial switch operation (ASO; n=14) was retrospectively analysed. Coarc showed 2.39+/-4.33 vs. 3.09+/-2.24 mm of growth during the observation period (21+/-16 vs. 30+/-27 months); no growth (0 vs.16%), restenosis (14 vs. 37%) and reinterventions (14 vs. 11%) were similar (all in U vs. P, P=ns). BDG showed 3.68+/-3.43 vs. 2.50+/-2.55 mm (P=ns) of growth during 15+/-5 vs. 29+/-18 months (P=0.046); no growth (17 vs. 0%), stenosis (0 vs. 14%) and reinterventions (0%) were similar in U vs. P, respectively (P=ns). Main pulmonary artery (MPA) anastomosis in ASO showed 0.28+/-1.73 vs. 1.30+/-3.16 mm of growth during 8+/-14 vs. 28+/-28 months; no growth (60 vs. 14%), stenosis (50 vs. 63%) and reinterventions (0%) were similar (all in U vs. P, P=ns). Anastomotic growth, stenosis and reintervention rates show no difference between interrupted U-clip and polypropylene running sutured technique in Coarc repair, BDG and MPA anastomosis in ASO.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053451468

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19648148

DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.196709


Related references

Running suture versus interrupted suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy: a randomized study. International Journal of Urology 22(3): 271-277, 2015

Vein and artery growth after anastomosis with vascular closure staple clips vs interrupted polypropylene suture: application in pediatric vascular surgery. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 40(9): 1428-1435, 2005

Interrupted coalescent nitinol clip versus continuous suture coronary anastomosis: a comparative endothelial function study. Heart Surgery Forum 6(2): 72-76, 2003

Angiographic, ultrasonographic, and macroscopic assessment of aortic growth after VCS clips, interrupted polypropylene, or running polyglycolic acid anastomosis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 42(10): 1695-1702, 2007

Interrupted nitinol U-Clips versus standard running suture for the central arterial T-graft anastomosis: a prospective randomized study. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 40(2): E93-E97, 2011

Early Visual Recovery in Keratoconus Patients Undergoing Penetrating Keratoplasty With a Single Running Suture Versus a Combined Running and Interrupted Suture Technique. ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract Search & Program Planner : Abstract No 3235, 2002

Continuous versus interrupted suture for end-to-end biliary anastomosis during liver transplantation gives equal results. Liver Transplantation 13(2): 234-238, 2007

A new clip device for the construction of vascular interrupted anastomoses in congenital cardiac surgery. Heart Surgery Forum 6(5): 358-361, 2003

Running suture versus radial interrupted suture in surgical astigmatism. Annali di Ottalmologia e Clinica Oculistica 118(2): 193-196, 1992

Surgical facial wounds: simple interrupted percutaneous suture versus running intradermal suture. Dermatologic Surgery 25(2): 109-112, 1999

Comparison of suture-in and suture-out postkeratoplasty astigmatism with single running suture or combined running and interrupted suture. American Journal of Ophthalmology 122(5): 696-700, 1996

Comparison of Running V-Loc Suture Versus Interrupted Vicryl Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure, a Retrospective Cohort Study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 18(6): S86-S87, 2011

Single Running Suture versus Single-Knot Running Suture for Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study. Urologia Internationalis 95(4): 445-451, 2015

Comparison of Suture-in and Suture-out Postkeratoplasty Astigmatism With Single Running Suture or Combined Running and Interrupted Sutures. American Journal of Ophthalmology 123(5): 715-716, 1997

Simple interrupted percutaneous suture versus intradermal running suture for wound tensile strength measurement in rats: a technical note. European Surgical Research. Europaische Chirurgische Forschung. Recherches Chirurgicales Europeennes 43(1): 61-65, 2009