+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial

Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 51(6): 818

This study was designed to compare short-term outcomes after hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. straight laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Eleven surgeons at five centers participated in a prospective, randomized trial of patients undergoing elective laparoscopic sigmoid/left colectomy and total colectomy. The study was powered to detect a 30-minute reduction in operative time between hand-assisted laparoscopic and straight laparoscopic groups. There were 47 hand-assisted patients (33 sigmoid/left colectomy, 14 total colectomy) and 48 straight laparoscopic patients (33 sigmoid/left colectomy, 15 total colectomy). There were no differences in the patient age, sex, body mass index, previous surgery, diagnosis, and procedures performed between the hand-assisted and straight laparoscopic groups. Resident participation in the procedures was similar for all groups. The mean operative time (in minutes) was significantly less in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group for both the sigmoid colectomy (175 +/- 58 vs. 208 +/- 55; P = 0.021) and total colectomy groups (time to colectomy completion, 127 +/- 31 vs. 184 +/- 72; P = 0.015). There were no apparent differences in the time to return of bowel function, tolerance of diet, length of stay, postoperative pain scores, or narcotic usage between the hand-assisted laparoscopic and straight laparoscopic groups. There was one (2 percent) conversion in the hand-assisted laparoscopic group and six (12.5 percent) in the straight laparoscopic group (P = 0.11). Complications were similar in both groups (hand-assisted, 21 percent vs. straight laparoscopic, 19 percent; P = 0.68). In this prospective, randomized study, hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in significantly shorter operative times while maintaining similar clinical outcomes as straight laparoscopic techniques for patients undergoing left-sided colectomy and total abdominal colectomy.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053476175

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18418653

DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9269-5

Related references

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Trial. Yearbook of Surgery 2009: 261-262, 2009

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group. Surgical Endoscopy 14(10): 896-901, 2000

Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surgical Endoscopy 16(2): 234-239, 2002

Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 70(5): 873-877, 2007

Short-term outcomes for open and laparoscopic midline incisional hernia repair: a randomized multicenter controlled trial: the ProLOVE (prospective randomized trial on open versus laparoscopic operation of ventral eventrations) trial. Annals of Surgery 258(1): 37-45, 2013

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic nephrectomy as outpatient procedures: a prospective randomized study. Scandinavian Journal of Urology 52(1): 45-51, 2018

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part a 27(12): 1251-1262, 2017

Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Disease 14(9): E612-E617, 2012

Prospective multicenter study of the quality of oncologic resections in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 41(8): 963-970, 1998

Early results of a prospective multicenter study on 500 consecutive cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group (LCSSG). Surgical Endoscopy 12(1): 37-41, 1998

The Feasibility of Hand-assisted Laparoscopic and Laparoscopic Multivisceral Resection Compared With Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 27(4): E57-E65, 2017

A novel hand-assisted laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right colon cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 18(1): 355, 2017

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital: a prospective analysis of 104 consecutive cases. Surgical Endoscopy 20(7): 1077-1082, 2006

Comparison of postoperative outcomes between hand-assisted laparoscopic and conventional sigmoidectomy: a prospective non-randomized controlled trial. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 18(5): 442-445, 2015

The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Archives of Surgery 132(1): 41-4; Discussion 45, 1997