+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Heat stress in chemical protective clothing: porosity and vapour resistance



Heat stress in chemical protective clothing: porosity and vapour resistance



Ergonomics 54(5): 497-507



Heat strain in chemical protective clothing is an important factor in industrial and military practice. Various improvements to the clothing to alleviate strain while maintaining protection have been attempted. More recently, selectively permeable membranes have been introduced to improve protection, but questions are raised regarding their effect on heat strain. In this paper the use of selectively permeable membranes with low vapour resistance was compared to textile-based outer layers with similar ensemble vapour resistance. For textile-based outer layers, the effect of increasing air permeability was investigated. When comparing ensembles with a textile vs. a membrane outer layer that have similar heat and vapour resistances measured for the sum of fabric samples, a higher heat strain is observed in the membrane ensemble, as in actual wear, and the air permeability of the textile version improves ventilation and allows better cooling by sweat evaporation. For garments with identical thickness and static dry heat resistance, but differing levels of air permeability, a strong correlation of microclimate ventilation due to wind and movement with air permeability was observed. This was reflected in lower values of core and skin temperatures and heart rate for garments with higher air permeability. For heart rate and core temperature the two lowest and the two highest air permeabilities formed two distinct groups, but they did not differ within these groups. Based on protection requirements, it is concluded that air permeability increases can reduce heat strain levels allowing optimisation of chemical protective clothing. STATEMENT OF RELEVANCE: In this study on chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) protective clothing, heat strain is shown to be significantly higher with selectively permeable membranes compared to air permeable ensembles. Optimisation of CBRN personal protective equipment needs to balance sufficient protection with reduced heat strain. Using selectively permeable membranes may optimise protection but requires thorough consideration of the wearer's heat strain.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 053500841

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21547794

DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2011.558638


Related references

Intermittent microclimate cooling during exercise-heat stress in US army chemical protective clothing. Ergonomics 49(2): 209-219, 2006

Effects of Chemical Protective Clothing and Heat Stress on Army Helicopter Pilot Performance. Military Psychology 9(4): 315-328, 1997

Heat stress and bulkiness of chemical protective clothing impair performance of medical personnel in basic lifesaving tasks. Ergonomics 51(7): 1011-1022, 2008

Effects of metabolic rate and ambient vapour pressure on heat strain in protective clothing. European Journal Of Applied Physiology & Occupational Physiology. 74(6): 518-527, 1996

Heat gain from thermal radiation through protective clothing with different insulation, reflectivity and vapour permeability. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 16(2): 231-244, 2010

Influence of heat acclimation on physiological strain during exercise-heat stress in men wearing clothing of limited water vapour permeability. Journal of Physiology (Cambridge) 531P: 51P-52P, 2001

Effect of metabolic rate and ambient water vapour pressure on heat strain with protective clothing. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 28(5 SUPPL ): S197, 1996

Critical heat stress evaluation of clothing ensembles with different levels of porosity. Ergonomics 53(8): 1048-1058, 2010

Heat and water vapour transfer of protective clothing systems in a cold environment, measured with a newly developed sweating thermal manikin. European Journal of Applied Physiology 92(6): 645-648, 2004

Heat-protective clothing - protective effect and stress. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin, Arbeitsschutz, Prophylaxe und Ergonomie 33(6): 186-191, 1983

Heat stress in protective clothing: validation of a computer model and the heat-humidity index (HHI). Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 63(12): 1087-1092, 1992

Protective clothing and heat stress. Ergonomics 38(1): 166-182, 1995

Protective clothing and heat stress: introduction. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 43(5): 287-288, 1999

Reduce heat stress when wearing protective clothing. St Lawrence County agricultural news 77(7): 3, 1993

Heat stress in protective clothing. Interactions among physical and physiological factors. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 15 Suppl 1: 52-57, 1989